When we become the censors
GAY AS FUCK / My teenage nephews should not have been sent away from an erotic reading
Jim Deva / Vancouver / Friday, August 21, 2009
Share |

For the second year I have been granted the privilege of hosting my 14-year-old nephew from rural Alberta and his 16-year-old cousin for a week as they enjoy Vancouver, providing me an opportunity to have some influence on their view of city living, the enriching qualities of diversity and of course dispelling so many myths about my community that I am so proud of.

I take this challenge very seriously and planned taking a week off work to spend with them. But as luck would have it they arrived in Vancouver the very same day as the erotic reading evening, a Pride in Art event and my favourite part of the Pride festivities since its inception last year.

Naively, perhaps, I thought what a great opportunity it would provide to have the boys help with the Little Sister's book table at the event and enjoy my community at its best. What a great occasion to have the boys see the celebration of art and the open and honest way we discuss sex and our sexual lives as people step to the microphone to read erotic passages. As we paraded into the room, carrying boxes of books and all the tools of commerce — and I feeling honoured that Little Sister's had been invited to set up a table for the second year in a row — the cool and incredulous greeting at the door by the organizers quickly forewarned of trouble brewing.

We unloaded the boxes and prepared the book table at the back of the room and then did a tour of the amazing work by local queer artists that festooned the walls. The boys were engaged and challenged by the art and we began a great dialogue about some of the more demanding images, when the volunteer organizers surrounded me. One grabbed me by the shoulders and looked me intently in the eye, as if to grab my attention or to try to talk some sense into what must be my moronic actions. She slowly and methodically explained that she was the second reader to come to the microphone and that she would be talking about heavy duty SM, about tying people up and butt fucking them and she could not possibly be comfortable with "them" in the room and please send "them" away, as there was lots to do and see in the community centre.

I was stunned and quickly said I would comply with her wishes. As I walked towards the boys I immediately knew that I could not send them out of the room and that I would have to leave with them. Memories of a special event in my life over 40 years ago came flashing before me as I walked towards my summarily evicted charges.

When people try to figure out my opinionated and pushy personality I know they can never even begin to understand me unless they knew my amazing and bigger than life mother and a man I have always called My Bob. He was a teacher, English and Biology, who came to our small rural school when I was 14. We quickly formed a special bond that was to last all my life. He was the first adult to treat me as a complete individual — not a work in progress, but a total person capable of thoughts and ideas.

His love of reading bonded with mine and when he saw our small pitiful library one of his first actions was to go before the school board and demand a budget to augment the collection. He and I scoured the second-hand bookstores throughout Alberta, buying mostly paperbacks due to the limited budget. We catalogued them and proudly filled the shelves. It was not long until all hell broke loose when parents began examining the books their children were borrowing from the library. Many of the books in the new collection were deemed too sexual and adult in nature and we were forced to purge the collection of many of the best in literature to comply with the demands of the school board.

So My Bob and I read to each other the censored passages and discussed them and enjoyed talking about sex in all its variety, and I learned at an early age the importance of sexual expression in our lives. I lost My Bob some six years ago, but in his memory, and with the knowledge of who I was at 14, I would never tell my boys that they had to leave the room when sexually explicit matters are being discussed.

How quickly my situation had changed. I entered the Pride in Art event full of pride in my community and pride in my beautiful young nephews. Soon, I was making a phone call for help staffing the Little Sister's book table so I could leave the event without further confrontation.

Some might say I set up the situation and I acknowledge some foreshadowing of problems but it is my deep belief that young adults are sexual in nature. Now that sexual imagery is much easier to access, we must as a community show more pride and confidence in the importance of our sexual lives. No longer do young people have to rely on their parents' hidden pornography collection. Today, with the simple click of a mouse the most graphic images are readily available.

In my opinion, what young adults need is context to understand the sexual images they encounter. What better context than a community sitting, listening and indeed laughing with and applauding our deepest sexual fantasies. To the organizers of the erotic reading evening I apologize for pushing their boundaries, but believe further discussion is necessary if we are to make our events as accessible and profound as they should be.

Jim Deva is the co-owner of Little Sister's bookstore, best known for fighting against censorship by Canada Customs.




Share |


Reader Comments


 
GO JIM!
Very maturely handled, and expressed. I hope an open-minded dialogue happens from this. Make the change you want to see!
Kevin, Vancouver BC
08/21/09 9:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Open Minds
Too many young people today are only interested in the technology around us. So very few seem to even notice art and literature. The boys should have been welcomed with open arms for showing an interest in the art and literature available that evening. Censorship is one of the great evils of our society and it is the last thing two young impressionable minds need to be exposed to just because they show a healthy interest in something.
Laura Ann Scaife, Vancouver B. C.
08/21/09 10:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Tough Call
That was a very tough call to make. I totally respect Jim's decision to do what he did. On the other hand, I would hope that in the future he and his nephews will fight for the right to hear, speak and learn all they can. The speaker/organizer obviously had knowledge and insight to impart, and that's always important, no matter what the age. As queers we can only learn how to craft our worlds from each other... and our charges, be they our children, or the children of others... well, they learn from us first. From our actions and reactions to situations, perhaps more than the content of our words.
Milo, Milwaukee Wisconsin, USA
08/21/09 11:44 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Suggestion
It is not exactly clear whether the young men were REALLY interested in all of this, or simply too polite when their uncle imposed it on them. Did he tell them in advance what to expect when helping with the bookstand? Did he warn them about the gay art on the walls? On the other hand, before acquiescing to the reader's desire that "they" leave, he might ALSO have explained to them that the readings would be of a highly gay erotic or pornographic nature. He could have then asked them if they WISHED to leave rather than making the decision himself. Of course, there is also another factor involved... the law. If certain films are restricted to boys as young as these, perhaps the readings could have provoked some kind of illegal situation for the readers and/or organizers... Such is the delicacy of dealing with young people's sexuality! I suspect that the kids would have been totally fascinated by all of it... and not harmed. But then again, that is a supposition on my part. I once tried to watch a gay (not pornographic) film when suddenly my nephew and his friend appeared.. 13 and 14 year olds. I told them the film was subtitled, but they didn't care. So I told them their parents might not be happy with them watching something with gay content. They said that they knew all about such things and that it was no problem. Well, the upshot is that my own brother and his wife told me not to come back again, insisting that it was porn (even though it wasn't). I was then considered a "dangerous" influence on their children. But at least I had warned them in advance of what they were about to see... and then took the time to discuss the film with them later (based on a classic book in Italy which is even studied in the schools!) But that is what happens when you mix kids and gay sexual topics. And women are MUCH more protective of "children", even lesbians. So this author really opened a can of worms here. There are NO
Ken, Paris France
08/22/09 7:46 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Grow up !
at 14 and 16, these boys (as most 14 & 16 year olds of today are) more than able to have made up their own minds whether or not to watch and listen to the readings or in fact take a walk on their own avoiding anything that they didn't want to be exposed to. Hey Ken, get a life !
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
08/23/09 3:39 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Right.. ok... LOL
Ok first off... these are 14 year old boys... what were you thinking? Sheesh Im 40 and I wouldn't have wanted to sit through that just as you Jim probably wouldn't have wanted to sit through a reading on the new Sony PSP game Killzone 3. Taking them to the reading would be like if I was a bible toting Christian and I took them to church. Eeek... If my nephew were visiting I would be staying up late watching the movie Jackass, eating whipped cream out of the spray container and having him make me laugh so that peanuts come out my nose. Do you even remember being 14?
John Hernik, Toronto Ontario
08/24/09 9:05 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
protest a bit too much?
"I was stunned and quickly said I would comply with her wishes." You didn't have to do that because one person said so. And one person saying so doesn't mean the community was oppressing you.
Joe, Toronto on
08/24/09 3:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Welcome aboard!
Jim -- I wasn't there, of course, but I notice that the individual who addressed you in such an apparently condescending fashion seems to have been concerned about her own discomfort and not at all about your nephew and his cousin. It would be interesting to hear what she has to say about that. I suspect that many people are distressed by the very idea that young people might be interested in sexual matters; it spoils their Disneyesque view of the world. But rather than face this, they persuade themselves that it's not they who are threatened, but young people. A thought-provoking piece of real life, Jim, well told and a great start for your column. Welcome to Xtra.ca!
Ken Popert, Toronto Ontario
08/25/09 1:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The meaning of words
First, the promotion of this event was like this: "Queerotica addresses the importance of free speech and freedoms in artistic expression", also, the add in the Xtrawest No.415 as well as in the flyer, do not specify that the event was not for youth people. I was there and I saw they also turn down a person with a video camera; reason why I find the position of the curators of this event pretty much a double standard, in one hand they promote their event as "free speech", but they censor it. So there is freedom just from the side of the readers, give me a brake! Google "free speech" guys! You can not announce something as "free speech" and then become cryptic, that's contradictory and unprofessional. Thank you Jim for speak up again. In my opinion you nephews shouldn't leave the event, actually they shouldn't be annoyed at all.
Kiki of Vancouver, Vancouver BC
08/26/09 12:54 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
tell me you are smarter than this...
I was at the reading last year. It was PORNOGRAPHY - clearly it was an adult event. perhaps the organizers should publicize that in the future, but if you were there last year, you know better. In this country, exposing minors (14 7 16 you said) to pornography is ILLEGAL. In addition, I suspect that Pride in Art gets government grants. Who are you to put their funding or the venue into potential jepordy. Did you think about anything other than YOURSELF? And how is it censorship when one adult says to another adult I don't want to expose MINORS to hardcore sex? next time get a baby sitter instead of putting venues and events at risk. There is a difference between education and exposure. Give your head a shake. How could you think it would be OK?
C. Brown, Winnipeg manitoba
08/28/09 3:40 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Really?
Jim- Look, it's one thing for kids to be educated on sex and how to protect oneself from not getting pregnant and/or STD's and it's another thing letting a kid sit during a reading where one is talking about beating and then fucking and biting and anal fucking and vaginal fisting and such. For one, you don't want them fisting other girls without explaining to them what Vaginal fisting is and frankly, when I was 14, I would have felt awkward and weird if I sat through something like that and then later someone explaining to me that you can stick fists in vaginas. I mean, you just gotta understand where people is coming from and that is positive censorship.. BTW I love fisting!
C. Kayle, Long Island New York
08/28/09 4:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Grow a pair!
I was stunned and quickly said I would comply with her wishes. WHY? I would have told her to go fuck herself. Hypocritical idiot. This is the new queer prudery -- showing off the individual as "transgressor" because they discovered sex acts that other humans have been doing boringly for millenia but they're new to the individual so "wild". Yet the same person has a prissy nanny state policing of other's in a manner so conventional to be Christian. Really transgressive there, lady. What a "community". What a joke. Gay men's cuture in gay men's hands -- let the others form their own policed events and let the men talk sex without fear of queer women's (and worst queer "bois" -- gasping self-male-haters of the most shrill kind) censure. You had a chance to show your boys that you had some balls and walked your talk and you skulked away pussy whipped by PC thuggery. Don't feel badly, 90% of older gay men today are also wilting ninnies in the face of the new Queer Behaviour Police. Shame.
david, toronto ON
08/29/09 8:45 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
apparently, our heores are fallible
Jim Deva is a hero of mine. But I'm confused as to why he's choosing to attack other queer organizers by calling them censors. Censorship is the act of denying expression. The event in question was a queer BDSM KINK reading -- did someone try to prevent a kinky writer from reading? No. Instead, the organizers upheld existing laws that make certain materials unavailable for consumption by minors. These rules are flauted all the time (hey, that's what the internet is for) but when a room full of adult audience members become complicit -- as well as public servants and a community centre -- it's another matter. Sure, the Pride in Art folks could have added "this event is for adults 18+" to their event postings. They didn't. I assume they forgot. (Bet they won't next time!) By bringing his young relatives to the queer porn reading, Jim put the organizers in the difficult position of enforcing rules that they themselves did not create. These are laws that we are all subject to, whether we are watching films, entering night clubs or gaining admission to bath houses. Whether we agree with the rules is up to each of us. But when we ask others (event organizers) to assume the risk of our own wilful rule-breaking, that's another. I applaud the event organizers for having the courage to stand up to a local hero. We cannot follow our leaders blindly. Sometimes they make mistakes.
s+m, vancouver bc
09/01/09 3:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.