New gay men's health campaign: 'Calculate your risk'
GAY MEN'S HEALTH / Vancouver campaign steps away from standard 'use a condom' message
Natasha Barsotti / Vancouver / Friday, July 16, 2010
Share |

Do the math. Calculate your risk.

That’s the catchy title of a new ad campaign the Health Initiative for Men (HIM) is rolling out for gay men seeking more information than the standard “use a condom every time you have sex” refrain.

Initially, it was going to be a condom campaign, HIM project coordinator Jody Jollimore says, but that approach quickly morphed into a more nuanced campaign about risk.

Among the campaign’s key messages: “Not all sex has the same risk. Your risk of picking up or passing on HIV depends on the kind of sex you’re having and who you’re having it with.”

“What we’re finding is that while the questions on the surveys ask, ‘Are gay men having unprotected anal intercourse?’ — and while that number seems to be increasing — infections are not increasing in the same rate as risk-taking,” Jollimore explains.

“So what it means is that gay guys are finding other ways to reduce the risk, not just using condoms anymore,” he continues. “They’re using testing practices to determine whether they’re both negative or both positive — they’re finding people who have the same status as them.”

Do the Math presents eight different scenarios showcasing 16 local gay men in higher- and lower-risk situations in order to target the widest possible demographic of men who have sex with men.

“Instead of looking at this [as] group think — like if not everyone wears a condom, we’re going to transmit HIV — we’re trying to look at individual situations and say what’s going on in [a particular] scenario,” Jollimore elaborates.



The idea is not to privilege a particular kind of hookup or relationship, he says. “People are really happy with the complexity of it — that it’s not a simple one-fits-all message.”

Jollimore says the campaign is the brainchild of a volunteer advisory committee that included young men, older men, HIV-positive and -negative men, people with expertise in social marketing and an understanding of gay male demographics.

“Go to the website,” urges HIM executive director Wayne Robert. “We really do hope people go there and find that information, and find it useful, and find it really makes a difference for them.”

“Often [this area of health] is characterized as being incomprehensible, and there’s so many messages out there that have come and gone, and I think people really get fatigued about it,” Robert notes.

“One of the things I feel I can say to people about this is that they will find that it is respectful of their lives. It’s respectful of their ability to make their own decisions,” he says.

Vice-chair of the BC Persons with AIDS Society Ken Buchanan says the campaign is going to make people “stop for a second and think about what they’re doing.”

He hopes the campaign will prompt people to think about their own health, their partners’ health, wearing condoms and getting tested.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Serosorting
So, serosorting basically. Makes perfect sense to me. Interestingly, there are posters up all over Montreal claiming that serosorting is discrimination, which is total horseshit. I'm sure experts in the field will correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to represent a major change in approach and policy to safe sex education. I do wonder if HIM isn't opening itself a can of worms however - the only safe sex is sex with a condom, and to suggest that risk might otherwise be mitigated on the assumption that the information sexual partners provide is truthful might cause major problems for the initiative further down the line.
William, Montreal QC
07/18/10 10:25 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Drug users don't care about advertising
I've seen guys on E or whatever other battery acid drug lose all inhibition. Smoking or shooting up, whatever. And so many guys wandering the Market in Ottawa do anything for their next hit. Until drugs are removed from the picture all the ads in the world won't stop these types of guy. Then add the younger guys coming out of jail with diseases, angry, hopeless, isolated. Disaster waiting.
richard, petawawa ontario
07/18/10 6:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
B4 we have sex, let's get tested TOGETHER.
I wonder if anybody else reading xtra. ca BEFORE having sex with somebody they both got tested TOGETHER for A VARIETY of STDs. Imagine setting up services around our communities where sexual health checkups together can be like going out for a little bite together.
thezak, cambridge massachusetts
07/19/10 12:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
"Do the Math?" Logical genius!
This campaign is sheer genius, acknowledging the real-life decisions folks make around their sexual health! @William: How is HiM's campaign "serosorting, basically"? There are six images and almost a dozen profiles categorizing every binary (and in-between!) from "tops/bottoms" to "monogamous/open" to "seroconcordant/magnetic", etc. SIDENOTE: I would assert that serosorting is often hypocritical discrimination. In *my* definition—unlike HiM's—serosorting has nothing to do with condom use and everything to do with simply choosing a partner based on their serostatus. That being said, for negative folks using condoms and trusting in their efficacy, it is hypocritical at worst (ignorant at best) to serosort. Either we trust the condoms or we don't. Oh, and the only safe sex is no sex, actually, and that campaign doesn't work. We mitigate risk all the time, why should sex be different? In my closing comment to *you*, I think to suggest that the sexual information provided by our sexual partners is *dishonest*—dishonest is one thing, inaccurate another—will cause major problems for our entire community down the line. @Richard: Drug users aren't always on drugs. How do you think folks get into recovery? @Zak: Oh, it's you again. "Do the Math's" brilliance is in no small part due to its realistic pragmatism. I am not alone in expressing that I am not going to take my trick from the club/bar to some all-night STI clinic (maybe such a thing exists in NYC) to get tested before we have sex. Hats off to HiM! Lark@gaycity.org
Lark Ballinger, Seattle (Um, south of British Columbia?)
07/21/10 1:12 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Simple Logic
Lark, the logic is simple. HIM is suggesting that people calculate the risk of their sexual encounters, and by extension, obviously avoid the riskiest activities. That would be having sex with HIV+ men, and it's known as serosorting, and it makes perfect sense. Condoms are essential for safer sex, and avoiding encounters with men who you know are HIV+ is additional protection.
William, Montreal QC
07/22/10 5:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
You missed the point, William.
William from Montreal, were you on the same site I was? www.checkhimout.ca/dothemath ?? I read all the profiles and tool kit, (with the exception of the withdrawal section because I just don't think that's a good idea) and I would have to disagree with you on several points. First, I do not agree that HIM is recommending or advocating for serosorting. It seems to me they are asking that guys calculate and reduce their risk of transmitting HIV. One of those ways is to know your HIV status. They profile several ways to avoid giving or getting HIV, one of which is serosorting (among several others). I also don't think you really get serosorting, because it's not as simple as avoiding 'HIV-positive men', just ask HIV-positive men - many of them serosort. Serosorting is not just for negative men, it's for all of us. And like the website says, it's not fault proof. A guy could be HIV and not know it. I'd like to congratulate HIM for trying to give gay men choices. Shame on you William for incorrectly simplifying a complicated message. Both positive and negative men need to do their part of prevent HIV from spreading in our communities. Wouldn't you agree?
Jesse MacHale, Vancouver BC
07/26/10 12:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.