Centre AGM felt 'a little bit rubberstamped': observer
THE CENTRE/QMUNITY / Annual general meeting did not address relocation
Natasha Barsotti / Vancouver / Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Share |

QUIET AGM. The Centre's Jun 18 AGM 'went through so quietly, not a lot of discussion, not a lot said,' said one observer. Co-chair Craig Maynard (above), who has been on the board for 13 years, was re-elected by acclaim.
(Chris Howey photo)
It took the board of The Centre — now rebranded as Qmunity — only 45 minutes to get through its Jun 18 annual general meeting, which included the election of new officers but never addressed the hotly debated issue of the organization's possible relocation out of the gay village.

Board documents distributed before the meeting started addressed the negative effects of the economic recession on the organization's donation and sponsorship base but remained silent on the location issue — save for one paragraph labelled "Challenges" in the executive director's report.

"A development project that had potential for a new space for The Centre/Qmunity fell through," the report states, "however, there are other similar amenity space possibilities on the horizon and we work closely with city staff to explore all such options."

No specifics are given regarding other possible spaces.

The board chair's report does not address relocation at all.

In April, news surfaced that The Centre was considering a move to reduce overhead facility costs, with relocation to Burrard and 7th as one of the possible options.

Lawyer barbara findlay was among the community members who were swift to condemn that option at an Apr 16 Centre board meeting, saying such a move would kill The Centre.

Since then several community members have called for a community consultation.

Board co-chair Craig Maynard did ask if there were any items the gathered membership wanted to bring up under new business, but there were no requests from the floor for any additions to the agenda.

Maynard then presented each of the reports on paper, gave the members a few minutes to peruse them and called for a vote of acceptance.

The Centre's annual general meeting felt "a little bit rubberstamped," said one attendee, Daniel, who asked that his last name not be used. He said he would have liked to see an oral presentation as opposed to a quiet perusal of written reports.

"The whole process went through so quietly, not a lot of discussion, not a lot said," he noted. "Not that I'm looking for people to have a fight, but it was quiet, wasn't it?"

"I would have liked to know [about] the location issue, where they stand. That hasn't been very clear as to where they stand," Daniel continued.

"I use the Bute St clinic, that's why location concerns me," he added.

Another attendee who didn't want his name used at all said he was also surprised that there was no update about relocation and that none of the gathered membership raised the issue.

The Centre feels like it's running a realty office, said Maynard when asked for an update on relocation at the Qmunity launch Jun 15.

"We are getting as much as information as we can but again, no specifics have been decided — Burrard and 7th or any other location," he said. "There's just more work to be done. The market, the head lease space and sublease space markets are constantly changing. If The Centre board is to make a good financial decision for the members and for the community, we have to make sure we understand what our options are financially and physically," he said.

"So no decisions have been made. I don't think anything is going to be made in the very near future — so I'll say, nothing further on Burrard and 7 or nothing specific on any other location," Maynard reiterated.

As for the St John's United Church site on Comox and Broughton Sts, which several community members have encouraged The Centre to pursue with other community partners, Maynard would only say that discussions have so far been of the noncommittal kind.

"All we've had right now is initial discussions with Gordon Neighbourhood House and they're sort of conceptual discussions," he noted.

"Our executive director has had some initial discussions with Gordon Neighbourhood House, [with] their executive director. Basically I think at that stage of the game, it's whether the groups feel like they would work together conceptually and seeing if there is basis for a bit of a beginning and that's the nature of the conversations you have — what would you want, what would we want, how do you think it might happen, the revenue streams," Maynard elaborated.

Asked what kind of financing The Centre/Qmunity can bring to the project, Maynard referred to the third phase of a feasibility study, begun in 2006, which was supposed to determine public and community willingness to fund a new facility.

Asked if a community-wide consultation could be a useful gauge of that willingness, Maynard says it would have a year ago. "But a year ago, we were looking at Burrard and Davie where it was a different financial arrangement," he explained.

"So we suspended the third phase because the likelihood was we weren't going to be buying a property of our own; we were going to become a lease. What we would have had to have done is come up with money for a sinking fund to pay for costs in the future."

While the donor base is known anecdotally, he said, the city would have required a thorough analysis of the types of donors who would contribute to the project.

With the onset of the economic downturn, he noted, everybody's ability to donate has dramatically changed.

"If we had proceeded we would have essentially wound up with false data that we couldn't use later. To do it now we have to have a sense of what is the project we're building," Maynard added, taking into consideration the current economic landscape.

According to the treasurer's report, The Centre incurred a net loss of just over $25,000 in 2008. It noted that grants and donations fell in 2008 with government grants falling by a little over $20,000.

"This was compounded by reduced donations of approximately $8,000 from the prior year," the report states. That loss was offset by an increase in funding as a result of volunteer assistance and community fundraising events, the report adds.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Qmunity (or whatever name you want to use).
I am amazed that all these changes can be happening and I have to read about it in Xtra West. As a paid Lifestime Member as well as an Honorary Lifetime Member, I never receive any news at the centre. In spite of the fact that my partner and I (both Lifetime Members) occasionally give financial support to the centre, we are not even on their mailing list. This is hardly the way to build community support.
Michael Kalmuk, Vancuver BC
06/24/09 9:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Michael Kalmuk's Comment
Hello Michael Thank you for your comment. I apologize about the apparent lost contact information with respect to your's and your partner's Honourary Lifetime Membership. Please email me at craig.maynard@qmunity.ca and I would be pleased to bring you up to date and ensure that you are on our mailing list. Readers of Xtra! West should note that Honourary and Lifetime memberships were rarely bestowed. So, Michael and his partner are amongst our community heroes who made significant contributions to our community and to Qmunity's early years. I'm sure it was said before, but it is worth saying again; thank you to Michael and his partner. Craig Maynard
Craig Maynard, Vancouver BC
06/24/09 10:21 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Want info? Speak up
I'm again amazed at the one sided, biased 'journalism' Xtra West has presented here. Actually, I'm not surprised. I was at the AGM. Floor was open for anyone to ask questions, air concerns. In fact there was lively discussion on auditingand financial reviews -- which went unreported here. There was a great presentation on the new name and web site, despite technical difficulties -- again, not reflected in this report. But not ONE person asked about location. If all the 'community' is doing is wait to be told by Xtra West and the so-called 'community leaders' who air their 'concerns' in the media but don't bother showing up for the AGM, then the 'community' has only itself to blame for not knowing what's going on.
Brian Lin, Vancouver BC
06/24/09 10:51 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Leadership is about being proactive
I think some readers have missed the point of the article. Yes, people presented could ask questions for more info and no one did. But here’s my question - why weren’t the Qmmunity leaders more proactive and forthcoming? An AGM is an occasion when an organization can reflect on the past year and present its achievements and challenges to the members. So, just like giving a presentation about the new website, the ED and Chair could have reviewed the past year’s challenges (e.g. funding shortfall) by each giving a short oral presentation. Particularly with challenges, they could have used that an opportunity to incorporate members into the dialogue, call for support, and attract newcomers into its membership based. But, I digress. I made the effort to be there and observe. I was motivated to go particularly because of the reporting from Xtra West and I was hoping to find out more. But after sitting through the meeting, I still only know what Xtra West had reported previously. That disappointed me. But having to read the above comment further adds a sense of frustration. I don’t think it’s fair to antagonistically tell an observer to “speak up if you want info”, because it’s not a observer’s responsibility to initiate a discussion, especially on a sore subject. I believe that the responsibility lies with the leaders, who is sitting at the head table, to direct the conversation. Frankly, and I think others would agree, if the leaders and their peers want more support from the community, then they must proactively include anyone interested as an integral part of the conversation – not just consult, but actually be open and lead when the opportunity arises. Instead of being reflexive and improve on the criticisms, taking an accusatory tone and shaking fingers towards the media or other critics only polarizes the conversation and makes observers to lose motivation. And ultimately, it is the organization who gets hurt the most.
Daniel (the observer quoted in the article), Vancouver BC
06/26/09 8:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
two sides of the same coin
Thanks, Daniel, for clarifying your stance. Interestingly, I think we're talking about two sides of the same coin. My beef with most of what's being reported and most of what's being written about Qmunity's past and recent challenges is that people seem to think it's the Qmunity's staff and board's sole responsibility to ensure *every* queer in the city knows everything there is to know, to engage them, to consult with them, all while running social services programs with little funding stability and plan for the future in a very uncertain economy. Building Qmunity, ANY Qmunity, is a two way street. A recent cover story in Xtra West touted the Jewish Community and their big shiny community centre, and asks why Qmunity can't do the same. Well, all you have to do is compare the amount of donations received by the two organizations to see why. Before "observers" demand frequent updates and public consultations, pro-active outreach and everything else under the sun, remember how much Qmunity staff are doing (with very modest salary and in a dismal working environment) and how much time and energy the volunteer board is already committing to the cause, and ask themselves "what have I done for my Qmunity lately?"
Brian Lin, Vancouver BC
06/27/09 12:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
XtraWest - Be Green
So,tens of thousands of copies of XtraWest (issue 413 June 18) were distributed with a small telephone book insert with the whole package wrapped in plastic. Hey, XtraWest - what's your environmental policy? First, massively cut back on hard copy distribution. Second, never again distro an issue like this. Third, by the end of this year your paper should be available online - only. The Seattle Post Ingelligencer went completely online this year after more than 100 years of hard copy distribution. You've displayed a phenomenal lack of environment awareness considering every copy will eventually become garbage opened or not.
Pepper, Vancouver British Columbia
06/29/09 3:31 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Inventing News
Xtra Worst seems hell-bent on taking down our gay community centre. For a gay newspaper, they sure seem hostile to those people volunteering their time to help our community. Shame on Xtra for such sloppy "gotcha" journalism.
Steve, Vancouver BC
06/30/09 9:20 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.