Bill targets anti-Olympic signage
2010 Olympics / Flies in the face of free expression and unreasonable search and seizure: Eby
Jeremy Hainsworth / Vancouver / Friday, October 09, 2009
Share |

 Two days after activists launched a complaint against the City of Vancouver's Olympic bylaw claiming it will infringe on freedom of expression, comes news that the provincial government is now preparing legislation of its own that will allow officials in Olympic cities to raid British Columbians' homes to remove inappropriate signage during the Games.

The BC Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) says the BC government's Bill 13 proposals will allow Richmond, Whistler and Vancouver to enter residences and other private property with only 24 hours' notice to remove or cover up signs.

The amendments to the Municipalities Enabling and Validating Act (No. 3) are supposed to apply only to the three Olympic cities in February and March 2010.

BCCLA president Robert Holmes says the legislation means British Columbians will face official sanction if they put up anti-Olympic signage in their own homes.

"Telling people who exercise free speech that local authorities may barge in, rip down signs inside your property, fine you or throw you in jail will underscore the growing impression that our governments care more about their own camera appearances at Olympic events than about people's rights," Holmes says.

The bill will allow changes to the Vancouver Charter to permit fines for sign and bylaw violations of up to $10,000 per day and imprisonment for up to six months.

Previously, people had 14 days to comply with the Vancouver bylaw, and fines were $2,000 per day.

In a statement the government said the changes will "provide the municipalities of Vancouver, Richmond and Whistler with temporary enforcement powers to enable them to swiftly remove illegal signs and graffiti during the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. The legislation does not change the existing scope of authority to regulate signs and graffiti. Rather, it provides, on a temporary basis, a faster way of removing signs and graffiti that violate municipal bylaws during the short period the Games are underway."

BCCLA executive director David Eby contends the bill flies in the face of Charter rights for free expression and against unreasonable search and seizure.

Gay Vancouver-West End MLA Spencer Herbert says the city needed the province to sign off on the local bylaw with enabling legislation.

"It's kind of been driven out of VANOC to the city to the province," Herbert claims.

Eby goes one step further.

"It really does speak to the remarkable power of the [International Olympic Committee] to limit powers," he says.

A call to the BC premier's press secretary was not returned prior to posting this article.

The provincial law is at first reading and has not yet passed. If the law passes, municipalities would need to enact their own bylaws to take advantage of the new powers granted.

Eby says he appreciates that the stated purpose of the Olympics is the promotion of sport. "It could do this without impacting freedom of speech and putting a country and a province into debt for years," he says.

VANOC CEO John Furlong said Wednesday the lawsuit is a city issue and not a Games' one.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
an embarassment for Canada
That VANOC and the province of BC would go to such ridiculous extremes to suppress free speech is a major embarassment for all of Canada in my opinion, that's the sort of thing you'd expect in China but certainly not here in Canada, I can't believe anyone would support a law that gave the police the power to enter your own home and remove and signage they didn't like, how far have we sunk as a nation if this bill passes. I'm okay with protesters being banned inside Olympic venues or even on the outer property of the venues but certainly they should be allowed everywhere else and especially in their own homes, I never in my wildest imagination would've believed this sort of thing could happen in Canada, something must be done to protect civil and individual rights in BC, even if the feds have to step in and put a stop to it since it reflects on all of Canada, not just BC or the cities directly involved, must repression of the local population be a part of every Olympics since China? What a disgrace!
Rich, Toronto Ontario
10/16/09 3:24 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Where is the uproar about this bill ?
Well said Rich.
Jeff Taylor, Toronto Ontario
10/19/09 2:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Bad bill but lets be a bit realistic
Although I agree this bill is far too extreme as a resident of Vancouver I can see what they are trying to do. For the last five years certain groups have been trying to hijack the Olympics and use it for their own ranting soapbox. The government and Vanoc are worried that these groups want another "Battle in Seattle". Lets be clear, the Olympics are not about poverty or homelessness in Vancouver. They are not about the oil sands, government spending, global warming, the war in Iraq or Canada's involvement in Afghanistan. These are all very important issues but the winter Olympics is not the place to voice all the rhetoric and outrage. The Olympics are about the world coming together peacefully in amateur sport. Some of these athletes train for years to get one or maybe two opportunities to compete and represent their countries. I resent all these groups feeling that they can hijack the games to further their own causes and or careers. We do so little to support our athletes and teams I wish just once we could turn off the "we hate capitalism" crap and just enjoy the games. Vancouver/Whistler and Canada are hosting the world but the most vocal groups they will see are a bunch of pot smoking, ipod toting, dreadlock sporting, middle class, twenty something wannabes trying to tell me whats wrong with world. So yes the bill is outrageous but so are the groups that are planning all the RIOT 2010! protests.
Mike, Vancouver BC
10/20/09 2:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Bollocks
Mike wrote: "The Olympics are about the world coming together peacefully in amateur sport." WRONG. The Olympics are about re-directing obscene amounts of public funds into the hands of developers, hoteliers and other wealthy "entrepreneurs" who bankrolled the Gordon Campbell "Liberals" in their dishonest election campaigns. Mike wrote: "Vancouver/Whistler and Canada are hosting the world..." But are *whining* about paying for the cost of the athlete's village, while towns in the rest of the province lose their schools, hospitals, government offices, etc. Hey, Vancouver voters voted FOR the Olympics, yet the rest of the province was not ALLOWED to vote, so screw you. You wanted it, YOU pay for it, and keep your grubby mitts off the Provincial treasury!
Nathanial, Slocan Valley BC
10/20/09 4:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Bollocks to Bollocks
Guess what Nathaniel? Tourism is one of the biggest industries in this province and to pass up an opportunity to be part of one of the biggest tourism events in the province's history would be beyond stupid even for a slackjawed yokel from the Slocan Valley. Plus the amount of employment alone that has been generated since the announcement of the Olympics has kept this province booming. Everything from the rebuilding of the Sea to Sky highway to the new Canada Line both of which were desperately needed would never have happened otherwise and have employed thousands. The exposure that the region will get during the games will be felt - positively for many years to come and is worth every single penny. The reason so much money from the public coffers comes to the Metro Vancouver are is because that is where most of the people live and where most of the tax dollars come from in the first place. I am sure you will be back slamming me for this Nat so go ahead you will never convince me you are right because you are not right. Oh and just so we are clear. This delusion so many people have that if the relatively small amount of the overall provincial budgets that was spent on the Olympics was not spent, that somehow the government would be putting it towards social issues is laughable. Come on people, ignore the 2010 haters and get out to support Canadian amateur athletes. They need you now more than ever.
Mike, Vancouver BC
10/20/09 5:25 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.