Whose Pride is it anyway?
EDITORIAL
Julia Garro / Toronto / Thursday, July 02, 2009
Share |

Now that the haze and hangovers are clearing let’s assess. After a rough run-up to the festival for the organization behind the event, the 2009 edition of Toronto’s Pride Week went off without any major issues. No twinks were trampled to death in the crowds, no fisticuffs broke out between rival political factions during the Parade and, aside from the cancellation of the annual flag-raising ceremony at City Hall and a dance party at Hanlan’s Point, the city’s ongoing labour dispute didn’t have a significant impact on the festivities from a spectator’s point of view.

It was, all in all, everything we’ve come to expect from Toronto Pride: Plenty of opportunities to party harder, longer and faster; lots of corporations competing for our eyeballs; hordes of people who may or may not support our rights eagerly assembled to take in the spectacle of our colourful queer culture; and lots of folks high on excitement, chemicals or a combination thereof.

I can honestly say that I’ve never felt so disconnected from Pride in the 10 years that I’ve been participating. While I applaud the efforts of folks who took this year’s event and made it their own — a special shout out goes to the organizers of this year’s Friday night Trans March — I had a hard time connecting to the spirit of Pride, the feeling that we as queer people were coming together to claim space, bring attention to our issues and celebrate our fabulousness.

Although there were lots of awesome events going on during Pride Week (I particularly enjoyed The 519’s Queer Family Pride Party) I fear the main event itself is slowly but surely becoming an unwieldy tourist extravaganza with a dwindling quotient of gay flair. There’s the now entrenched corporatization, the sometimes alienating magnitude of the event and the growing anonymity of something that was once rooted in community. Looking around the very mixed crowd on Church St this weekend it seemed like more of an exercise in crowd control and entrepreneurial spirit than a celebration of same-sex attraction.

But part of my lacklustre response could be attributed to mixed feelings about the organization behind the event, Pride Toronto. On the one hand I appreciate how much work goes into organizing an event of Pride’s magnitude. Like it or not the fest has become a monster child, with all sorts of associated logistical nightmares. I also appreciate how difficult the year must have been for the organizers — by accident or design there was a huge turnover in staff members between the 2008 and 2009 Pride Weeks. So here’s to all the people who made Pride happen. You pulled this one out of the fire and that’s no small feat.

On the other hand Pride Toronto has shown a lot of defensiveness and an impulse to exert control that worries me, not to mention some extremely poor communication. I’m dismayed by reports of volunteers who are feeling less than appreciated, less than listened to. I’m alarmed that the leadership at Pride Toronto doesn’t quite seem to understand the difference between being nonpartisan and being apolitical. I’m shaking my head as to how certain entertainment acts with no discernable queer connection were favoured over local bands featuring actual queer performers. I’m questioning the ideological significance of introducing a VIP line bypass system that allowed preferred access to Pride stages for a fee.

Pride is something that belongs to all of us and although we rely on Pride Toronto’s growing staff and huge team of volunteers to coordinate the event we want to know that at the end of the day they’re paying attention to the community that birthed the event, the people the event is supposed to be for and about.

I hope now that this year’s event is over and done with that we — as individuals, as a community — will take a step back and ask ourselves what Pride means to us and what we are willing to do to make it meaningful. Become a voting member of Pride Toronto and have your say. Stay tuned to Xtra for details on Pride’s next general meeting or watch Pridetoronto.com for updates.

Pride is dead. Long live Pride.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Lack of introspection
I have to say I found the lack of introspection in this editorial pretty breathtaking. I'm in no way associated with Pride Toronto, but from my perspective it seemed like Xtra carried out a vendetta against them from the first day the new ED spoke to their reporter. Presumably she didn't show the proper deference to Toronto's queer media monopoly. Xtra created a controversy, and inserted itself into the story again and again in a fashion that would make a real newspaper blush. The idea that Xtra today still acts like it is the spiritual successor to the Body Politic is disgusting. Xtra's editorial board needs to take a hard look at what this paper has become, and then, when you've dealt with your own narrow, shallow, boring and commercial take on the queer community, maybe you'll be in a position to criticize others.
Paul, Toronto ON
07/02/09 7:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
what will make us connect
I tend to agree that there was something missing from this year's Pride. Especially when we remember 2003, just days after we queers got the right to marry in Ontario, or 2004, when we had a summer election just days away and feared that our marriage rights could be stripped from us. 2009 didn't give us much to celebrate or demand, per se, and the crap economy definately made an impact on the number of [American] visitors we've come to expect. However, I did notice one particular theme keep coming up (that wasn't a Michael Jackson tribute) - International Queer Rights. At two of Pride's main stages (where I was working in the beer tents), several MCs brought attention to the raw statistics that should give us all pause, that there are too many countries where homosexual behavior and/or identity is punishable by death and/or imprisonment. I thought this year's theme CAN'T STOP/WON'T STOP was appropriate, and universal. Maybe in years to come, Toronto will become *the* city that makes the most noise about human rights for LGBT folks worldwide. We've acheived so much here, it's now our turn to speak out for those who can't - which also includes those who face discrimination from within their repective culture communities here in Canada. I think future Prides will make this a principle issue.
Ryan, Toronto Ontario
07/02/09 7:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
VIP tix need answers
"I’m questioning the ideological significance of introducing a VIP line bypass system that allowed preferred access to Pride stages for a fee." Much of Pride takes place on public space so if Pride is going to use public space to promote class-based VIP access I'd like them to explain why they should be allowed to use public space. I think much of the criticisms against Pride this year have been unfair but this VIP line bypass system is abhorrent.
Not VIP, Toronto Ontario
07/06/09 2:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Xtra!'s Coverage of Pride is not Credible
I have to agree with Paul. It's true that Xtra! has pursued a real agenda against the Pride organization since their ED's, admittedly ill advised, refusal to speak to the paper. The problem with that is that it seems to have clouded Xtra!'s news judgment, not just on Pride itself, but on a number of other important stories that were ignored while we had to endure yet another "How dysfunctional is Pride" story. In the past few months, Xtra! has largely ignored important gay stories such as Skate Canada's alleged campaign to 'de-gay" their sport or the violent death of a gay Mississauga man, where the Crown later dropped all charges against the alleged assailant. These stories received wide coverage in the mainstream press, including on ABC news in the skating case, and an editorial in the Mississauga News which harshly criticized the Crown decision in the later. Where was Xtra! on these issues? No where to be found. And even with the Pride stories it did cover, it failed to tell the whole story. For example, Pride's handling of the Israeli politicization issue was directly related to an implicit legal threat they received from a local lawyer and Xtra! advertiser. This was well documented through local Jewish news sources, yet strangely this never made into the Xtra! article. Instead, Xtra! sought comment from two sources that had been previously referenced in an unrelated story in the same issue. Recycling of sources comes off as editorial laziness and does not inspire confidence in Xtra!'s journalistic judgment. Enough with the Pride stories. It is one week of the year. There are stories happening every day that are of interest to and have an impact on Xtra! readers, yet the paper is failing in its mandate to cover them.
Rick, Toronto ON
07/10/09 11:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.