Taxing thoughts
EDITORIAL / Tories to censor 'offensive' cultural products
Gordon Bowness / Toronto / Friday, February 29, 2008
Share |

It's as if the bête noir of free expression in this country, former head of the Ontario Censor Board Mary Brown, had been resurrected as a tax lawyer. Talk about a nightmare.

Stephen Harper and the Conservative government in Ottawa continue their secret rightwing campaign with more stealth legislation, this time a little improvised explosive device buried in reams and reams of proposed changes to the Income Tax Act. Bill C-10 would allow the Minister of Canadian Heritage to deny tax credits to film and TV productions deemed offensive because of explicit sex or excessive violence, among other things, what ministry spokesperson Charles Drouin labelled as anything "contrary to public policy."

Even after funding agencies like Telefilm and the Canadian Television Fund have agreed to support a particular project — the green light for any production in Canada — if the ministry weighed in and denied tax credits, then funders and producers would have to make up the shortfall. Such insecurity threatens Canada's entire financing system for film and TV — the whole point of the tax credit system in the first place was to encourage a more stable financing environment. Producers need to know their budgets going into any project — not coming out. Without that security, filmmakers will go elsewhere. By attacking freedom of speech this bill threatens a $4.8-billion industry.

Such a far-reaching change was never discussed before the Canadian public. The relevant clause, running just 13 words in a bill tens of thousands of words long, is more proof that the Tories have a hidden agenda. The government knew those 13 words would have significant impact: guidelines had apparently been drawn up and an infrastructure in place to implement the new policy.

Hiding a censorship program in the Income Tax Act? These Conservatives are not the straight-talking honest brokers that I used to recognize as Tories when I was growing up in western Canada.

No one in Parliament debated Bill C-10's proposed changes (introduced way back in November 2006 as Bill C-33). I guess our elected MPs were too busy avoiding an election to read the fine print — to be fair, the clause is well and truly hidden. No one noticed it until third reading in the Senate. The Senate!? I guess that's why they call it "the chamber of sober second thought." But the Tories feel it's a chamber of ill-repute. Harper was willing to force an election over the Senate doing its job, reviewing proposed legislation like the government's omnibus crime bill. That some senator or someone in a Senate committee raised a red flag over C-10 surely must prove to Harper that the Senate, too, is offensive and "contrary to public policy."

This backdoor censorship gambit follows an increasingly long line of procedural changes initiated by the Tory government and their backroom cronies: killing the Court Challenges program, shifting monies away from AIDS prevention and treatment, refusing organs from gay men for use in transplants.

This government is at war with Canadian culture. There was virtually no mention of the arts sector in the last budget; no mention of the $49 million repeatedly requested by Ontario's big cultural institutions; nothing coming close to the previous Liberal government's support, matched by Queens Park, to the tune of $200 million.

And yet this is the same Tory government that thinks you can promote Canadian culture in Afghanistan from the barrel of a gun.

Who and what is offensive in all this?


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Come on
Only an idiot would think freedom of speach extends to the right to get a cheque from the government. I film makers are honestly saying the only reason they make movies is because they get funded by tax-payers to do so, then they're not artists, they're just scumbags.
Trevor, Winnipeg Mb
03/01/08 5:26 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
You're missing a very large, relevant point
Gordon, how are you missing this important queer-related point? Charles McVety, president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, lobbiest extraordinaire for Bill C-10 wants the proposed law to remove tax credits retroactively for productions that "promote homosexuality", among other things. I produce a series, "Chris & John to the Rescue!" (which airs on OUTtv, a network PTP partially owns), that ostensibly promotes the homosexual lifestyle (probably moreso than any other television series currently airing in Canada, that would rely on said tax credits). Our forthcoming seasons will depend on us using these credits to offset our costs and if Mr. McVety's lobbying efforts come into law, our show could be deconstructed retroactively. Which means that *after the show is shot, chopped and scored* it could be stripped of it's tax credits. Frankly, this is an outrage. And to Trevor from Winnipeg - First of all, only an idiot would spell "speech" wrong. Secondly, you're clearly uneducated on the entire situation. Film and TV tax credits aren't some generous government bounty, they're an economic stimulus. The government makes more money from the productions that exist because of the tax credits than they do in giving the tax credits. Gordon is right, the gov't is at war with Canadian culture. First the splitting of the Canadian Television Fund into two streams (lobbied by fatuous gasbag, Jim Shaw) and now this. I'm a Canadian TV produce who is spitting mad with the Conservative government. *angry face*
Chris, Toronto Ontario
03/01/08 12:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Where is the opposition and the media!
Equally concerning is that the opposition parties did not examine the legislation adequately to allow debate to take place so that the legislation could be stopped at an earlier stage. The ability of Canadians to respond to the hidden agenda of the Conservatives depends upon the opposition catching these ploys and the media publicising them. Lets hope its not too late in this case and lets hope for more vigilence in the future! Our democracy depends upon it.
Gordon, Calgary Alberta
03/03/08 10:20 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
How to protest this stinkin' Bill
There's a Facebook group for those wanting to fight the Bill: it has info on where to send letters, and people are working to organize demonstrations in Ottawa, Toronto, and Montreal. Go to http://facebook.com/group.php?gid=9036150977
David, Edmonton Alberta
03/03/08 4:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What's next
What's next if the goverment get's there way. There going to change the income tax act so only people that meet there standards can work in canada. I think its time for a new goverment of canada. This one seems to be following in the foot steps of other leaders. (Hitler)
Ed, Kenora Ontario
03/04/08 12:24 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Opposition
If this is such a common sense issue why was it buried in a large bill on taxes? Why defend a government bent on legislation by stealth?
Richard MacKinnon, Hamilton ON
03/04/08 1:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
double standards.
Although I don't believe the government should give out credits based on ideology or beliefs, I have no doubt that an NDP government would also deny tax credits for productions that it would consider ant-abortion or ant-gay, or anything by the Chrisitan right -wing. So I think you protest too much.
Stephen Reeves, Toronto Ontario
03/30/08 4:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.