HIV and long-term care
HIV NEWS / Frontline workers need more training as patients live longer
Andrea Houston / Toronto / Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Share |

Seven years ago, HIV survivor Kenneth Poon was so sick his body had deteriorated to a frail 65 pounds. He lost his sight and couldn’t walk. At Casey House, the Toronto hospice he called home for more than two years, he was moved to the “big room upstairs” -- the room patients never leave.

Miraculously, doctors brought him back from the brink. In 2007, he was given the good news that he was being discharged.

However, unable to live independently, Poon was forced to quit his job as a fashion designer for Holt Renfrew, sell his house and move into a nursing home temporarily. He was 45 years old at the time.
Kenneth Poon with his poodle Aiyden in the dog park behind his Sherbourne St apartment.
(Andrea Houston)


At Lincoln Place, where Poon was the only openly gay resident, he kept to himself. The average age of other residents was about 80; many had dementia and Alzheimer’s. He felt isolated and alone.

One day at dinner he noticed there was blood dripping down his arm from a small cut. A personal support worker (PSW) grabbed him, held up his arm and pulled him into the nurse’s station. “He has HIV," shouted the PSW. "Kenneth is bleeding. He has AIDS!" 

Poon says everything stopped.

“There is normally a hum of chatter and footsteps in the hall, but at that moment you could hear a pin drop. The PSW did the worst thing. He disclosed my status. By the end of the night, everyone knew I was positive.”

After that, things changed. Residents stopped talking to him and many kept their distance. At mealtime, people asked staff to pass the bread to avoid talking to Poon directly.

Poon contacted Casey House, whose staff visited Lincoln Place and offered information and education to staff there. Poon says that the stigma people with HIV continue to face in long-term care, along with homophobia and transphobia, forces queer seniors back into the closet.

“Long-term care facilities are not ready. All staff need training and residents need education because there is so much stigma and discrimination in long-term care,” he says.  “With the drugs today, people with HIV can live to age 80, but eventually everyone needs someone to look after them.”

Poon now lives in a Toronto apartment with his guide dog, Aiyden, and his partner, Al.

But he is not alone. Experts in long-term care and HIV/AIDS are noticing an alarming gap. People with HIV are living decades longer than before and are dealing with a host of illnesses associated with aging, such as dementia, cancer, diabetes, liver disease, osteoporosis and kidney problems.

That’s why Sue Graham-Nutter, executive director of corporate affairs and communications for the Rekai Centre at Wellesley Central Place, reached out to Casey House for help.

There is growing recognition in long-term care that more training is needed for providers so they are prepared for more people living with HIV entering the system, she says.

“What we are finding is people with HIV/AIDS are aging at a much faster rate than the norm,” she says. “At much earlier ages, some as young as 40 or 50, it seems their bodies are exhibiting characteristics [associated with] aging faster than the regular population.”

Medical treatments and antiretroviral drugs have advanced considerably over the past 20 years. HIV is no longer a death sentence, doctors at Casey House say; it’s now a chronic disease.

There are more than 7,254 people living with HIV/AIDS in Ontario over the age of 50 years, according to the province’s vital statistics registrar. Of that number, 62 percent live in Toronto.

“I was staggered when I looked at those numbers. It’s much higher than I thought it would be,” Graham-Nutter admits. “These are people in their 50s, 60s and 70s that doctors didn’t think would live. Now that’s an issue for long-term care. Their needs are much different.”

Stephanie Karapita, chief executive officer at Casey House, says there is a lack of awareness about the “greying of AIDS” in long-term care, particularly in facilities outside downtown Toronto.

“We want this to be addressed quickly,” she says. “LGBT seniors are twice as likely to be isolated and live alone. They are quite vulnerable. Add in issues surrounding HIV/AIDS and aging. . .

“The number of people with HIV in Toronto continues to grow. And they are aging.”
Casey House in Toronto.
(Rob Salerno)


Every day, two people in the city are newly infected with HIV/AIDS, and one in 120 adult Torontonians, about 18,000 people, is living with HIV, according to a December report released by Casey House to coincide with World AIDS Day.

The report also found that the number of Ontarians with HIV/AIDS increased by 31 percent between 2003 and 2008 and continues to rise.

“By 2015, more than half of all people with HIV in North America will be over the age of 50,” Karapita says.

“When Casey House first opened in 1988, we were about dying. With the introduction of antiretrovirals in 1996, we shifted our focus to living with HIV. Now we are looking to support people as they age with HIV,” she says. 

Graham-Nutter says that if funding is secured, training will be offered to all frontline staff, such as PSWs, nurses, doctors, pharmacists and dieticians.

“Located so close to Toronto’s gay village, [Wellesley Central Place] staff have already had some training, but they need more training. We realize that,” she says.

 


Share |


Reader Comments

These reader comments are posted directly. No editorial review is made prior to posting. Readers may contact the moderator with any complaints or concerns, and these will be reviewed within two business days.

 
LTC Costs
Most people overestimate the cost of a good long-term care policy. A healthy, married couple in their mid/late fifties, can share a policy that starts off with over a half million in benefits for about $100 per month per spouse. There’s a new type of government-approved long-term care policy that can protect your assets from Medicaid even after the policy runs out of benefits. Here’s an explanation of how these policies work: http://bit.ly/How-Partnership-Policies-Protect-Assets Chris
Christopher Olson, Redlands California
01/10/12 4:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The PSW
didn't just do the "worst" thing he also broke the law and acted illegally by outing (hiv status) Mr. Poon in such a manner. He should have been arrested and charged.
Tim, Toronto ON
01/13/12 11:34 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The prevention of infection is important too
A person has the right to have his information kept private. At the same time, the staff has a right to know how to protect themselves from infection, from someone who has a particular illness which can be passed on through blood. (Informed consent?) In an emergency the prevention of infection is as important as taking care of a patient and keeping all his secrets. Which choice is more important?
Joe, TO ON
01/13/12 2:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
If you think
SHOUTING out his AIDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! status and the subsequent discrimination and isolated behaviour Ken suffered is legally defensible, you are wrong. The only infection being spread around is ignorance and criminal unprofessionalism. Get a grip. At the very least the PSW should have been fired on the spot.
Tim, Toronto ON
01/13/12 3:12 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
2 separate and equally important issues
There are 2 separate and equally important issues here. 1st. The point of view of the staff who immediately needed to know that the bleeding patient could potentially infect them with a life long illness (HIV). If I were one of those staff, I would have wanted to know, so that I could take extra precaution while helping the patient. 2nd. The point of view of the patient's privacy. The other patients unfortunately alienated Kenneth, knowing his HIV + status, which had as much to do with their lack of education and prejudice. That is a separate yet related issue. The PSW should not be immediately fired in a grand dramatic gesture as it play out in your mind. He was also concerned for the safety of the staff. He may have been freaked out by what he may have thought to be an emergency, where he had to consider the treatment of the patient and the safety of the staff as equally important. Emergencies do not always produce cool rational minds.
Joe, TO ON
01/13/12 5:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Staff does not have to know anything.
Staff should be using universal precautions at all times to protect themselves from infection. All that would have been required was for them to do their jobs correctly. And someone who can't control themselves in what they perceive to be an emergency is a danger to patients and should be fired for that reason alone.
Patrick, Toronto ON
01/13/12 9:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Hey Joe,
you're so....so...reasonable. Kenneth should never have been put through what he was put through. To rationalize the pain inflicted upon his blind and disabled self is I think cowardly and morally infantile. But then again, I think there are two issues, one being what is acceptable and what isn't? What is human evolution and what is human devolution? Two separate issues entirely.
Not Joe, Toronto Ontario
01/13/12 9:28 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
P.S........
Before I paint Ken as a victim. Those who know him know that this is NOT his thinking. He is much too kind. So I want to be clear. I am not speaking for Ken, just the scenario. He can speak for himself quite eloquently. Thank you.
Not Joe, Toronto Ontario
01/13/12 9:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
accelerated aging
Marriage is a great thing. Gay marriage would be great if there was anyone to actually meet. Where the hell did everyone go? I mean, yea, it's great that the majority of society understands the importance of same-sex relationships, but did we ever get the message in relation to each other? I've never been treated as badly as I have by other gay people - straight people have been great. Other gay people only are interested if you have lots of money, look perfect, have a post-doctorate degree, million-dollar condo, wear $600 sweaters and unlimited amounts on credit cards. We expect each other to be flawless, yet we are reminded constantly in the media about gay drop outs in schools who never go back, isolation, suicide, depression; so do we tell these people indirectly that they should kill themselves because we'd never accept them anyway? Why have 'gay pride' when clearly it's all about individual pride (we certainly don't have any pride or interest in the struggles or stories of any other gay people since we all think we're the most special thing out there). Sorry for the rant but we need to get over ourselves. There's too many of us killing ourselves because of the isolation, addiction and indifference of both straight and gay societies that can't be bothered with anything other than celebrity status affluence.
Greg Wiliams, Peterborough Ontario
01/14/12 1:04 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
apologies previous post was an error
My apologies. That is a cut and paste error. This interface jammed on me and I was trying to recover what I had written. What is posted there is repost of comments from someone else on another topic and have no relevance to this subject. Very frustrating. I have asked the moderator to delete
Greg Williams, Peterborough Ontario
01/14/12 1:10 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Post Your Comment!
Your Name:
(required)


City/Town:
(required)


Province:
(required)




Email Address:
(required)



For verification purposes only. Not for publication, nor released to any mailing list. (Privacy statement)

Title of your comment:
(required)


Your Comment: (max. 2000 characters)
(required)
characters remaining

 Refresh
Enter the code shown on the left (case-sensitive):
(required)




   
Click here to read guidelines

Guidelines for reader comments

Submissions go directly online, without being seen by editors. So, it’s important that you follow the laws against defamation. Do that by keeping your comments focussed on issues, and on your ideas and opinions. Do not get personal and do not defame others. If you see defamatory comments made in other people’s postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment must directly relate to the subject of the article.

Avoid confusing statements; express your thoughts clearly and succinctly so readers will understand your opinion. Do not post superficial comments, such as a short phrase or just a few words.

Do not post promotions of products, services or events. If you see such postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment and name may also be published in an Xtra paper.

Publication of your comments on Xtra.ca or in an Xtra paper is not an endorsement of your views by Xtra.ca or Pink Triangle Press.