Anti-gay discrimination still in place on organ donations
PROVINCIAL NEWS / Donations drop in year following new rules
Krishna Rau / Toronto / Monday, January 26, 2009
Share |

ACTION. Queers, led by university students, took to Parliament Hill in Feb 2008 to protest Health Canada's new organ donor policy.
(Marcus McCann photo)
Organ donations in Ontario have dropped sharply in the year since Health Canada imposed stricter rules on organ donations from gay men.

According to Gary Levy, the director of Canada’s largest organ transplant program at Toronto’s University Health Network, the number of deceased donors in the province dropped from 199 in 2007 to 175 in 2008. Levy says there are no definitive statistics on how much of the decline was linked to the new rules for gay men.

In December 2007, Health Canada quietly enacted rules that prevent any man who has had sex even once with another man in the past five years from donating organs. Health Canada already bans any man who has had sex with another man (MSM) even once since 1977 from donating blood.

Doctors are still able to use organs from gay men if they get the recipient’s consent and the doctor signs an “exceptional release” form.

Levy says the drop in donors has meant deaths in Ontario.

“Potentially you can get seven organs from each person,” he says. “At least 120, 130 or 150 people died who could have benefitted from organs.”

Levy says there are no statistics to show to what extent the rules on gay men contributed to the drop in donations, but that the system can’t afford to lose any potential donors.

“How much it hurt us we can’t tell at the moment,” he says, “but organ donation is a very precarious thing. When things like this happen, I don’t think it turned out to be a positive. It didn’t help us to work with the public.



“I worked tirelessly to get the federal government to understand that it was unnecessary and it did nothing for safety.”

Levy says the 199 donors in 2007 was a record year for organ donors in the province. In 2006 there were 162 donors in the province, but Levy says the drop is still disappointing.

“The 199 could be looked at as a blip,” he says. “It’s not that substantive but it certainly was moving in the right direction. It’s very disappointing because people died.”

Neither Health Canada nor Canadian Blood Services (CBS) — which took over the national administration of organ donations in April, as well as controlling blood donations — could provide national figures for 2008.

Levy says he will continue to sign exceptional releases for donations from gay men, as well for donations from other groups who have to undergo the process.

“Age is one factor,” he says. “Over the age of 55 is considered an exceptional release. If they were a drug addict, which is not the ownership of any element of society, that’s an exceptional release.

“I sign exceptional releases at least 60 or 70 times a year. There are at least 100 to 150 exceptional release forms signed in Ontario each year.”

Joshua Ferguson of the group Standing Against Queer Discrimination (SAQD) — which has been campaigning against the blood and organ donation policies — says those policies are unlikely to change any time soon. He says things are worse since CBS took over.

“The MSM policy is now being regulated by the same source that is unwilling to change an outdated, stagnant policy based on ideologically founded fears rather than current epidemiological evidence,” states Ferguson in an email.

Ferguson says he was recently asked to take part in a consultation with CBS. He says CBS appears to be ignoring medical and scientific research.

“The organ and blood donation policies are now imbricated in political and public relation reasons rather than ethical and epidemiological ones,” he states.

Ferguson says participants in the consultation told CBS that policies should focus on risk rather than sexual orientation.

“A general consensus from the meeting is that the MSM permanent deferrals need to focus on behavioural-based questions that would articulate the actual risky sexual behaviours that actually places someone at a higher risk, regardless of their sex and/or sexual orientation,” he writes.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Oh God....
This article fails to mention that the new policy didn't introduce any new procedures regarding organ donation. Doctors are still doing the same things, like signing exceptional releases (as Levy notes, though the article conviniently fails to mention that this is what has always happened, it's not something new). As Levy also notes, it's the formalization that did nothing for safety, NOT the procedures themselves. SADQ is the last group I would go to for any scientific opinion; the Facts page on their website (http://www.saqd.net/facts_en.htm) is filled with inaccuracies and tries to say that the London population is somehow mathematically appropriate surrogate for sampling Canada as a whole (among other dubious things). I hope SADQ actually tried to LEARN from the CBS meeting instead of going with demands or superficially dramatic presentations.
Chris Damdar, Toronto Ontario
01/24/09 2:14 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
At least...
At least Xtra and SAQD aren't calling it an "organ ban," which I suppose is a small victory of reason over irrationality.
Chris d, to on
01/24/09 2:18 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I forgot this
And I think the biggest reason there was a drop in organ donations is because groups (like saqd and xtra) were leading members of the queer community to believe they were banned from donating. Many groups are STILL perpetuating that myth.
cd, to on
01/25/09 10:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
testing
is it too expensive to test for deseases? i mean, apparently gay men are more likely than others to contract aids etc. people are dying here. i don't know.
maria, edmonton ab
01/26/09 9:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Reconsider
I'm not sure how it can be seen as anything other than discrimination when you are not allowed to donate organs if you have had sex with another man in the last five years: that would include any sexually active gay male. Okay, so they aren't actually BANNED, but I'm not sure it's any different. Further, SAQD is the first group I've heard of that is addressing this issue, which has been a discriminating policy for as long as I've given blood (eight years or so). I think the fact that SAQD is actually challenging this should be supported.
Julianna, London Ontario
01/27/09 4:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Response to "Reconsider"
"I'm not sure how it can be seen as anything other than discrimination when you are not allowed to donate organs if you have had sex with another man in the last five years: that would include any sexually active gay male." This is not true. "Okay, so they aren't actually BANNED, but I'm not sure it's any different." It is different. "Banned" implies that MSM males are prohibited from donating organs. They are not. "Further, SAQD is the first group I've heard of that is addressing this issue, which has been a discriminating policy for as long as I've given blood (eight years or so). I think the fact that SAQD is actually challenging this should be supported." Any activism is ultimately harmful if it is based more on sentiment than fact (ie. spreads emotionally charged flasehoods). It is NOT the case men are banned from donating organs. As for blood, it is an unfortunate reliaty that MSM males (NOT gay males) have a higher prevalence of HIV. This isn't something cooked up by blue-suited doctors sitting in offices. This is a number that is actually measured and observed. The best way to change this blood ban is to encourage safe sex in the queer community (condom use). By encouraging safe sex, we can lower HIV prevalence, which also incidentally saves lives. The WORST thing anyone could do is to attribute this to homophobia (which its not) and tell people they are banned from donating. Ultimately this lowers donation and leads to more deaths. What a coincidence! That is exactly what has happened. (PS I didn't say "safer sex" because I'm not sure what that means)
chris d, to on
02/15/09 11:20 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.