POWER to Feds: hooking laws don't work
LOCAL / New Ottawa group fighting Canada's sex laws
Nick Taylor-Vaisey / Ottawa / Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Share |

POWER PLAY. Sex workers are getting organized, after a meeting in February planned in part by Nicholas Little of the AIDS Committee of Ottawa.
(Paul Galipeau)
Canada's prostitution laws don't work, don't respond to community concerns and should be repealed. That is the message sex workers will be sending to federal lawmakers in the midst of an election at a rally on Parliament Hill on Sep 18.

This is the first time that sex workers have formed a united front in Ottawa on the issue. The newly formed group is called Prostitutes of Ottawa/Gatineau Work Educate and Resist (POWER). The Hill event will be followed by a "coming-out party" at the Byward Market's Lookout Bar.

Nicholas Little, the men's outreach coordinator at the AIDS Committee of Ottawa (ACO), says that POWER was established at an ACO-sponsored community forum during last February's Snowblower festival.

The festival's event, Everything You Wanted to Know about Sex Workers, informed community members about the sex trade from sex workers' perspectives. Afterwards, at a private meeting where sex workers discussed how best to confront common issues, POWER was born.

Critics of the anti-hooking laws have long argued that they only endanger sex workers by encouraging them to avoid taking precautions and work in unsafe areas.

According to Statistics Canada data from 2004, 93 per cent of all prostitution charges are made under section 213, which targets anyone who "stops or attempts to stop any person or in any manner communicates or attempts to communicate with any person" for the purposes of prostitution.

Across the province, consensual, commercial sex has been sliding from police radars. It's down 24 percent from 2000, according to analysis by Canadian Press. And while 2007 was a much quieter year than 2000 in Ottawa, with charges down over thirty percent, the survey doesn't account for hookers who are harassed or taken in to custody by police but ultimately never charged.

The Ottawa Police Service introduced a street team in Nov 2007 to arrest prostitutes and deal with other street-level crimes.

Chris Bruckert, a criminology professor at the University of Ottawa and former sex-trade worker, disagrees with the enforcement of laws that she says make workers "much more vulnerable to violence."

"When there is a fear of being watched, [sex workers] don't take the time to carefully assess a client, and they hop into cars much more quickly," she says. "The laws actively prevent sex workers from developing strategies that would make them safer."

Sex workers are more likely to work alone in isolated neighbourhoods, for example. On their own, they can't watch out for each other and are more vulnerable.

Ottawa Police, however, have a different opinion. The force started to crack down on sex workers last year and now regularly conduct neighbourhood "sweeps" that target street-level sex workers.

During the most recent sweep on Aug 18, police brought 65 charges against 20 women in prostitution-related offences.

Sergeant Kal Ghadban says prostitution has become a priority for the police, in part because of spin-off crimes that he said tend to be connected to the sex trade.

"If they're not out conducting prostitution, they have to get their money other ways. They could be breaking into cars; they could be breaking into homes," says Ghadban. "There are all sorts of spin-off crimes that are a result."

Little and Bruckert say that number is evidence that street-level prostitutes are overwhelmingly targeted by police and others are left alone.

"What we know is that only about 15 per cent of sex work is street-based. The vast majority is not street-based, and the police aren't interested in that," says Little.

Bruckert agrees that the folks on the corner are the ones that bear the brunt of police harassment.

"[Charges] are almost always levied against street-level sex workers — at the most marginal, but the most visible, sex workers," Bruckert says.

If Bruckert could dictate public policy, she says, her first step would be quite simply ignoring the existing laws, and then repealing them. But what are the odds of the Canadian public accepting decriminalization — de facto or otherwise?

"I think most people are fairly ambivalent towards sex work. It's consensual sexual activity between adults. I think for most people, it's a bit of a non-issue," Bruckert says.

 



Share |


Reader Comments


 
The truth
Just wanted to say that if you are a licensed escort or massage person you are doing nothing wrong in this country. Prostitution is legal. The law actually states "in a public place" Laws are written for the worst case scenario: ie: someone who is exploited as a child and is now addicted and an adult....consent is not an issue....drug induced consent is not possible. PLease dont print half truths...we know that the average age of entry in this country is 14
Mary, Edmonton AB
09/17/08 11:10 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The evidence
Mary from Edmonton writes: "we know that the average age of entry in this country is 14" That's news to me. Can you please provide the evidence for that statement, Mary?
Nicholas Little, Ottawa ON
09/17/08 3:17 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Some evidence
I absolutely agree that all people involved in street level prostitution deserve safe working conditions free from violence and police harrassment. Though I'm not convinced that sex work is simply "consenual sexual activities between adults". If most people are "ambivalence" about sex work, it's probably because they don't know much about the topic beyond the sensationalized version we get from our flat screens. As far as age of entry goes, here are a few stats: "Female prostitutes in Vancouver entered the sex trade at an average age of 16.3 years while male prostitutes entered prostitution at an average age of 15.5 years" (Federal/Provincial/Territorial Working Group on Prostitution [F/P/T], 1998, p. 23). “…since the average age of entry into prostitution in Canada is around 14, it is urgent that an action and information plan be established to prevent the prostitution of young people and to make the necessary efforts to protect and assist its victims”. See: http://sisyphe.org/spip.php?article1832 All the statistics for age of entry into prostitution vary from 13-16 years old in Canada and go lower in many other countries. But we're talking about Canada, and the decriminalization issue here is a hot topic. So is Chris Bruckert arguing for decriminalization? Does having more time to assess how dangerous a john might be and working in a populated area make sex workers (who are mainly women) significantly safer from male violence? Just think, if we decriminalize johns, pimps, and traffickers they have nothing to fear as far as the law goes. I say continue to criminalize these men, especially those who exploit 14 year olds. Wouldn't it make more sense to put energy into creating better economic options for people so their objective in life doesn't have to be defending their right to physical safety while working the streets?
Karen, Vancouver BC
10/16/08 8:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Almost evidence, but not quite...
Hi Karen, thanks for your reply - especially since it attempts to provide sources. You quote the 1998 Federal/Provincial/Territorial Working Group on Prostitution as saying that the average age of entry for females is 16.3 years. The age of consent in 1998 was 16 years so that seems to check out. (Of course, the age of consent for anal sex in 1998 was 18 - a difference based in homophobia which shows how hypocritical, subjective and morality-based the laws can be.) The http://sisyphe.org/spip.php?article1832 article says the average of entry is "around 14". But when you go that article, this claim is unsourced - the author just declares it is so - despite other claims in the article having sources provided. Given that the article is entitled "Prostitution : Towards a Canadian policy of abolition", the author's bias is quite obvious. Bias is fine as long as we back up our claims with peer-reviewed evidence... The bigger picture around age of entry, however, is this: when sex is exchanged for money with minors, we are not talking about prostitution. We are talking about sex with minors. You'll obviously find few sex worker rights organizations that advocate sex with minors. To the contrary, most will argue that the industry will be better for everyone if people enter it when they are able to do so of their own free will. Conflating sex work with pedophilia is just another smoke-and-mirrors technique used by abolitionists to derail an otherwise rational debate.
Nicholas, Ottawa ON
10/20/08 9:37 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.