Trans bill reintroduced in House of Commons
FEDERAL POLITICS / NDP, Liberals 'come together' to fight for trans rights
Dale Smith / National / Thursday, September 22, 2011
Share |

Both the NDP and the Liberal Party have reintroduced a bill that would protect trans Canadians from discrimination.
 
The bill was reintroduced to the House of Commons first on Sept 19, by Liberal MP Hedy Fry, and again on Sept 21, by NDP queer issues critic Randall Garrison.
 
The private member's bill, which passed during the last Parliament after it was brought in by NDP MP Bill Siksay, had been awaiting Senate approval when the federal election was called.
 
At the time, the bill was supported by most members of the opposition, as well as a handful of Conservative MPs.
 
The bill would give trans Canadians explicit rights under the Human Rights Act and the hate-crimes provision of the Criminal Code.
 
A police officer and a participant during the 2011 Trans March in Toronto.
(Marcus McCann)
Earlier this year, Toronto activist Enza Anderson told CTV’s Question Period that the bill was a huge achievement for the trans community because it “gives teeth to other human rights legislation.”
 
Fry says she decided to reintroduce the bill when Siksay said he would not run for reelection.
 
“I said, 'Look, if you’re leaving and the bill doesn’t get through, I will bring it back for you,'” Fry says, noting that she sent a letter to the NDP’s Libby Davies about the issue. “I said, 'It’s not about you or me, or the NDP or the Liberals, it’s about trans persons, so let’s come together and work on it.'”
 
Garrison says he looks forward to working with Fry, as well as any Conservatives he can convince to lend their support.
 
Several Conservative MPs, including cabinet ministers James Moore and John Baird, originally supported the bill.
 
Garrison also hopes to fast track the bill.
 
“We’ll see who’s ready to go,” he says. “We’ve already activated all of our networks across the country, and I’m making my contacts across the aisle, and we’ll be ready to go fairly soon, I hope. Since this has already passed the House of Commons once, that may mean we’re ready sooner than some of the other private member’s bills, and in that case we might move up, but it’ll certainly be within the next six months.”
 
Neither Fry nor Garrison can predict whether the bill’s second incarnation will face more resistance than the first.
 
Garrison remains cautious.
 
“I’m in the same position that [Siksay] was – you have to get it through the House first,” Garrison says. “I would hope we could convince senators to pass the bill as is, but I’ll start working on that as soon as I’ve got my votes secured in the House of Commons.”
 

 



Share |


Reader Comments


 
This would be nice but.....
I'm not that hopeful this Bill will pass, especially this time since the Conservatives are in no danger, unlike last Parliament, of losing power. So they have no reason to play the, you do me a favor I'll do one for you, game. I think the Bill should have been introduced as two separate Bills there by giving the Basic Federal Human Rights protections a better chance of happening. As the Bill reads now it's both or nothing type of Bill and we live in a society that isn't big on Hate Crimes legislation. I was disappointed by Siksays original Bill because of this in the first place. Crime Committees this parliament will once again be tied up with all the conservative Crime Bills Thanks your hearts are in the right place but ..... I'm hoping I'm wrong and will be more then happy to announce that I was
Rosalyn, Toronto On
09/23/11 11:16 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Consistency
Dear Dale, The bill is for the protection of Transgender AND Transsexual Canadians. Transgender is not an appropriate "umbrella" term for these two communities. Trans is because, you know, trans is the prefix to both of those words. Other than that, thanks for the story.
K, Ottawa ON
09/23/11 11:48 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Consistency
Hi K - Believe it or not, that's why I wrote, and they changed the term in editing.
Dale Smith, Ottawa ON
09/24/11 11:24 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
WOULD BE NICE But not betting on it ?
It's been going on for so long now. This needs to be passed. I do not get why it has been so long in the making. How many more will get beat & murdered or will take there lives due to hate against us before some one will listen. I know first hand what it is like to be a victim of hate crimes. Notice the s! But, it would be to much to put here and this site is not rated for the violence. I have endured hatred many times for being me. We stop it when it is domestic you go to jail but not if its just a Trans person. So, many need to know for the most part of being Trans its hard enough just to have to except yourself!!
brittany, Ottawa ON
09/24/11 8:09 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Second round
I'm really hoping the bill goes all the way through this time.
Oliver Leon, Montreal QC
09/24/11 8:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Fat chance
Canadians will never accept a man in a dress as normal, unless that dress is a kilt. Your warped leftist agenda is dead. Hedy Fry, you bitch, you are the WORST MP I've ever had.
ron, Vancouver Bc
09/25/11 5:55 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
ALL MUST be aware WHO/WHAT FEMALES ARE !!!
While more our University aged youth understand 'Positive Space' (a U of T campaign): http://womenscentre.sa.utoronto.ca/centre-policies/trans-inclusion-policy/ http://www.positivespace.utoronto.ca/introduction.htm Sadly, much of the older generation are still in the dark from their outdated 20th Century educational past, or from their Transphobic upbringing. It is important for everyone to realize that ALL humans are, without exceptions, genetically and physically fully endowed with a DUAL-POTENTIAL BI-Precursor Sex system: Müllerian+Wolffian Nephric Duct Systems http://www.aboutkidshealth.ca/En/HowTheBodyWorks/SexDevelopmentAnOverview/SexualDifferentiation/Pages/DuctDifferentiation.aspx And that ALL humans have a DUAL POTENTIAL due to hormonal influences giving rise to atypically 'less common' development of Brain Gender Identity (BGI): Brain Gender Identity [BGI] - a presentation by Dr Sidney Ecker, MD FACS (MS Power Point)[2010](MS PPT download) http://web.me.com/ceriserichards/TRANSGENDER_CONTINUUM/TRANSGENDER_CONTINUUM.ppt_files/BGI%203.5.5.ppt Combine awareness of both above: BGI = Female/Neutrois/Male BGI SEX = Müllerian or Wolffian SEX (NOT Female or Male SEX; the old notions are medically nonsensical and grossly oversimplified) The 'old' outdated binary notions that SEX = GENDER is shattered with the following SEX=GENDER 'combo' realities: 1) Müllerian Females 2) Wolffian Females: aka MtF Transsexuals 3) Müllerian Neutrois* 4) Wolffian Neutrois* 5) Müllerian Males: aka FtM Transsexuals 6) Wolffian Males *Neutrois: those with a BGI in between Female and Male (Intergenderals) Some folks may developmentally even be physically a varied mix of Müllerian-Wolffian SEX (aka: Intersexuals, neither 'fully' Müllerian Sexed nor 'fully' Wolffian Sexed) The above destroys, even eliminates, the trans pathology, that a person has the 'wrong body' transposed upon their gendered heart and minds b
Stefanie (SaintSuelle), Mississauga Ontario
09/27/11 3:49 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wolffian Females and Müllerian Males . . .
continued from above (previously truncated): The above destroys, even eliminates, the trans pathology, that a person has the 'wrong body' transposed upon their gendered heart and minds by normalizing the SIX above as NATURAL(LY occurring). Get it?!
Stefanie (SaintSuelle), Mississauga Ontario
09/27/11 3:56 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.