Gay Canadian MPs on the legacy of Bill C-150
HISTORY / 40 years since homosexuality was decriminalized
Video by Dale Smith / National / Thursday, May 14, 2009
Share |



Forty years ago, Canada's House of Commons decriminalized homosexuality with the passage of Bill C-150.

The omnibus bill — first introduced by then-justice minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau — touched on a wide range of social issues, including gay sex, abortion, gambling and divorce.

“It’s bringing the laws of the land up to contemporary society I think,” Trudeau told reporters after introducing the bill in the Commons on Dec 21, 1967. “Take this thing on homosexuality. I think the view we take here is that there’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation."

C-150 amended the buggery and gross indecency sections of the Criminal Code to ensure that anal sex between any two consenting adults (including two gay men) would no longer be a crime — as long as it took place in private and between participants aged 21 years or older.

"Something very momentous took place," says NDP MP Libby Davies, looking back at C-150. "The fact that laws criminalized people because they loved each other and they happened to be of the same sex — it's a horrific thing." Changing those laws was an important milestone in Canadian queer rights, says Davies.



Xtra.ca asked gay politicians on the Hill what they think about the legacy of C-150. Check out their responses below:

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

(Watch and share this video on YouTube)

Don't miss Xtra's two-part series on C-150 by Senator Laurier L LaPierre, starting next week.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Did I miss the Tory?
Are there any queer Tory MPs or Senators to interview? On the one hand I guess I should know better, but on the other hand, it is 2009. Also, I'm surprised nobody noted that the law regarding anal sex still has an anti-gay component 40 years later.
Randy, Windsor Ontario
05/14/09 12:54 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yes but...
Maybe it did and still does have a an "anti-gay" component, but considering that it's such a high risk behavior and people who practice increase their chances of contracting HIV...Maybe it should stay the way it is. HIV rates are rising amongst young gay men again. With a law like this there's a taboo keeping 18+ gay men from having sex with younger gay youth. This can help Younger gay youth avoid HIV. Besides why is anal sex so important? It's not like it's the pinnacle of gay sex that we all need to do to truly have sex with each other.
That guy, Edmonton Alberta
05/14/09 2:15 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
yes, but????
Am I actually reading this -- that criminalization is an effective public health approach for helping gay youth deal with HIV? That guy asks why anal sex is so important and I am left wondering where such a question can possibly come from other than an intolerance all the more loathsome because it is so naive.
Douglass St.Christian, Stratford Ontario
05/14/09 8:19 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The Tory
Hey Randy - Senator Nancy Ruth had initially agreed to participate in the video, but ended up pulling out before the interview took place. She's currently the only out member of the Conservative caucus.
Dale Smith, Ottawa Ontario
05/14/09 9:28 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Naive?? Intolerant?
I am not naive. I'm just saying what no one in our community seems to want to hear. What is naive is assuming that anal sex is low risk enough that childern as young of 16 can make an educated decision about partcipating in it. Participating in anal sex IS higher risk than vaginal intercourse and there IS a higher chance of contracting HIV (and other things) while doing it. Also, is there any reason why anal sex is so important to gay liberation? Straight people are capable of doing it and do do it and many gay men don't do it at all (belive it or not). So, I don't understand why loweing the age of conset for anal sex is important. There is nothing about anal sex that is inherant to being gay. The age of consent for sexual activity between gay people is the same as it is for straight people. So why focus on this one behavior?
That guy, Edmonton Alberta
05/15/09 4:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
twitter
i gust want to say some thing "great job" Update your Twitter randomly according to your intrest Or, from Rss Feed Or, from your own tweet message list Or, Any combination of t
srdha, kochi india
05/15/09 6:40 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Limp Wristed Pig
Check the cop in the background behind Scott Brison when he's speaking in the video; it looks like staged homophobic taunting as he makes a limp wristed gesture. Too purposeful to be ironic or coincidental, and way beyond sad! Wonder how many noticed & how many only assimilated the information subconsciously.
C.J.Pro, Brantford ON
05/24/09 2:56 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Don't see it
I don't see much of anything like that, CJ. And that looks like the Commons in-house security, not police, and who the hell knows - maybe he was just a swishy fag working security or someone - a swishy straight guy with extravagant hand gestures. It doesn't pass the test of homophobia with me. Let's not look for offence everywhere.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
05/24/09 4:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.