For bareback, how to fuck more safely
GAY AS OTTAWA / Reducing risk for those who do it raw
Nicholas Little / National / Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Share |

For heterosexuals, sex with condoms is considered an unfortunate but sometimes necessary exception to the otherwise natural norm. Whereas for gay guys, sex without condoms is considered a pathological deviation from the only acceptable option.


This double standard — instinctual for the straight crowd but demonic when done by gay dudes — creates a hell of a lot of pressure, guilt and fear.

Studies show that a majority of Canadian men who have sex with men use condoms consistently. That kind of behavioural change in just 25 years is amazing and we don't get enough credit for it.


We've been degraded as too horny to change, too reckless to bother, and too high or drunk to put a condom on even if we wanted to. We've been called bug chasers and gift givers. We've been written off as having a self-sabotaging death wish because our psyches are so damaged by homophobia. The death wish excuse has even been used to justify why health care dollars are wasted on us. It's all bullshit.

Let's be very clear. The Canadian AIDS Society classifies anal sex without condoms as a high-risk activity for HIV transmission. The overwhelming majority of HIV transmissions between two guys happen during anal sex without condoms and there is no way around this.

And living with HIV ain't a walk in the park — whether you're dealing with diarrhea, social stigma and, eventually, a truncated life expectancy.

The Canadian AIDS Society also says: "Any notion that the top partner in anal sex has a low risk of infection is untrue. Although more cases of transmission have been attributed to the bottom partner, the number of infections among tops is significant enough to make this a high-risk activity." Deny it if you want to, but them's the facts.

I get a lot of flack for giving guys harm-reduction tips if they choose to have anal sex without condoms. I'm told there is no such thing as safer barebacking. I'm told that guys who know the risk and still choose to do it raw get what they deserve — that I'm sending a dangerous message and undermining decades of prevention work.

It amazes me how most of us easily agree on some basic ways to reduce the (quite remote) risk of oral sex, yet so many are unwilling to even consider parallel methods for anal. Most gay dudes know it's better not to brush or floss about an hour before and after giving head. Is it really so farfetched that eating a barrel of peanuts before bottoming could leave your ass in rough shape?

The staunch refusal to consider multiple harm-reduction techniques for anal sex leads to higher rates of HIV. It's no different than George Bush and the pope telling folks to abstain from sex before marriage and always be faithful after. The presumption that you alone know the single solution that will work for all people is condescending, paternalistic and responsible for millions of deaths. Enough.

The tips below won't change the high risk nature of anal sex without condoms, but employing some of them can keep your good times at the lower end of the high-risk category.

  • Don't ask if he's "clean." Ask when he was last tested and what the result was. Better yet, offer him that info about yourself.
    HIV is mostly shared by people who don't know their status, not people who know they are HIV-positive. If he says he's HIV-negative but hasn't been for a test recently, he doesn't know his actual status. If one of you is HIV-negative and one is HV-positive, talk about viral load together. If you're both poz, you may not have the same strains of the virus or the same reactions to meds.
  • Get tested for other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). STIs make HIV-positive men more infectious and HIV-negative men more vulnerable to infection. The most common symptom of STIs is to show no symptom at all.
  • Use lots of lube. Tons of lube. Lube reduces friction, which reduces the number of micro-tears in the sensitive tissue in your ass. Tears give an entryway to the blood stream.
  • The lining of the ass is delicate and can be damaged easily. Let your top know how hard you want to ride him once you've relaxed the muscles in your butt. And barebacking after fisting or rough toy-play increases risk.
  • It's safer to pull out before cumming. Pull out right before and watch your load spray all over his back. Tell him how you want him to blow his load in your face.
  • For those who know their status: HIV-negative guys might choose to fuck rather than get fucked. HIV-positive guys might choose to get fucked rather than fuck.
  • The longer and harder the fuck, the bigger the risk. Foreplay makes you a better lover!
  • Try to avoid poppers when barebacking. They dilate blood vessels in the rectum, increasing blood exposure while you fuck.
  • Don't douche right before or right after bottoming.
  • Get vaccinated for hepatitis A and B. It's free for gay guys in Ottawa.
  • You don't have to bareback with everyone. For dudes who like the intimacy of not using condoms, get that rush with one regular guy and use protection with the rest.

Share |


Reader Comments


 
WTF?? Wanna lower HIV rates? STOP BAREBACKING!
Ummm...there is no "safe way" to bareback regardless of your orientation, your HIV status, or any of the "tips" listed above and, once again, it doesn't matter what your sexual orientation is. These harm reduction techniques still leave you with a very high chance of contracting HIV if you bareback, especially because you can never take someone's word they are HIV negative (this is no wehre near as effective as providing clean needles and pipes for drug user, or providing free condoms, which are effective harm reduction techniques in different areas). It's funny that the same paper that charges the medical community with homophobia for stating that MSM males have a higher HIV prevalence (an undisputed fact) then go on to publish an article encouraging the very behaviours that are probably a huge contributing factor to that very statistic.
Chris D, Toronto Ontario
07/16/08 2:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
more discussion
I think this story should be highlighted on the main xtra.ca page not just the Ottawa one, it's an important community discussion. I wanted to mention one point. It is definitely true that anal topping bare is not low risk. However it is *lower* risk than bottoming. To quote "Dr K" of the SF Public Health department: "nsertive anal intercourse, that is, the top, is about 10 times less risky than receptive anal intercourse, or the bottom. An HIV-negative bottom has about a 1 in 50 chance of getting HIV infected ...as a top, that chance is about 1 in 500. I think it's important to acknowledge this in these discussions.
Toronto reader, Toronto ON
07/20/08 9:39 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Barebacking is risky regardless of your position
Toronto Reader, Dr. K. does not give those stats as set in stone but simply relates them anecdotally as what he/she's heard "other people say" or something to that effect. Also the risk of getting HIV barebacking is so high regardless of your position that the difference between bottom and top risk is negligible. Tropical storms are less dangerous than hurricanes, but would you go for a stroll in either?
Chris D, to on
07/24/08 2:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Missing the Point
I think you're banging on the wrong door, Chris. Nick's article was not intending to advocate that people have bareback sex. It was simply suggesting that if you're going to pursue that kind of sexual activity, you should limit (not eliminate) the risks involved. The best protection and advocacy work has come from our community when we speak to where the people are, and to what they're doing. I applaud Nick for speaking to issues that are really affecting our community -- not ignoring them, pretending that it's not happening, or allowing them to incur further risk because their behaviour wasn't in line with what we think is appropriate. For too long, vulnerable members of society have not been advocated for or protected because they were deemed too risky. Let's end that shameful practice by speaking honestly and frankly about what's really happening and meeting people where they're at to limit risk.
mark, Ottawa Ontario
07/29/08 4:08 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Barebacking is unsafe
I have no doubt people are having unsafe sex in the queer community, but to say that any of the "tips" listed above "limits" the risk of barebacking is a joke and only serves to encourage sexual irresponsibility.
Chris D, to on
07/29/08 4:32 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
To add...
ALL people should be safe when it comes to sex. If there were effective harm reduction techniques that significantly reduced the risk of barebacking I would opt for those. I'm really not against barebacking but for the fact it is an easy conduit for viral transmission.
Chris d, to on
07/29/08 11:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Not to nitpick
Chris D says "Toronto Reader, Dr. K. does not give those stats as set in stone but simply relates them anecdotally as what he/she's heard 'other people say' or something to that effect." Actually no, Chris, this is a reference to several specific studies. Anal topping without condoms is ten times less risky that anal bottoming. I know you ask, what's the difference, it's all too risky. I'd tend to agree with you, but your opinion and mine don't change the facts, and they don't control other people's behaviour. Remember, in the absence of HIV, barebacking has zero HIV risk. It may seem controversial to say that, but it is 100 percent factually. All these facts need to be on the table in order to have a rational discussion.
Toronto Reader, Toronto ON
08/01/08 7:50 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Re: Not to nitpick
I don't think anyone is denying the facts (though I can't find the studies you refer to, nor can I find anyone who cites them, please help). Unfortunately there is no way to reduce the harm of barebacking and telling people otherwise does not help them, nor does it encourage safer behaviour. And, unfortunately, behaviours will have to change. Doesn't anyone remember those massive safe sex campaigns form the early 90s? Those messages still apply to everyone.
chris d, to on
08/02/08 10:40 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
give choice back to the people
hiv is easily spread it is a communicable disease, hiv is easily preventable through the use of latex condoms. Why is it so difficult for so many to accept that. I get really tired of "safer sex""advocates" who muddy the waters and confuse gay rights, sexuality, love and their own sexual turn ons as somehow being intrinsically tied into the prevention or non prevention of a communicable disease. How is this for an analogy; if you're not going to wear seat belts or have airbags in your car-we suggest that you remove sharp objects from your pockets and wear soft clothing, this will lower your risk of harm when you hit the windshield at----km/h. I grant it that sexual behaviour is not always easy to modify, and there will always be a few people who by accident or choice do not wear seatbelts (or have safer sex). To educate the largest number of people the message needs to be simple and then people have the choice to follow through or not. Young people are no longer getting the safer sex info that was available a few years ago. Instead there is all this confusing claptrap about what is and isn't safe sex. I mean really "barebacking after fisting 'increases' the risk" Jesus Mary Joseph and the little donkey too! Only a safer sex advocate as opposed to a safe sex advocate (this term has a history) could come up with this one. What is wrong with saying 'Never Bareback After Fisting'. when there is every indication that blood is going to be involved, it might not be bright red but it is certainly there in minute amounts. The kind of of bureaucratic wrangling that comes up wth a statement like that is deeply rooted in a counselling model that might do some good for a small amount of people but does no good for the general population
don, toronto ontario
08/02/08 11:18 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.