Choosing a Liberal Party president
FEDERAL POLITICS / Xtra asked candidates what they would do to reach out to queer Canadians
Dale Smith / National / Friday, January 06, 2012
Share |

At its 2011 biennial convention, starting Jan 13, the Liberal Party membership will elect a new president who will be responsible for helping the party rebuild over the coming years.
 
Xtra asked each of the five candidates what they think the Liberals needs to do to reach out to queer Canadians.
 
Sheila Copps: First of all, it has to actually have a strategy. At the moment, we’ve moved mountains on public policy, and we’ve never actually told anybody about it. One of the things that I’m actually doing is encouraging the creation of the GLBTQ caucus, and we’ve been working with . . . [Brad Lister, who] has just set one up. I’m looking for a way to create the momentum for a national GLBTQ caucus in the context of the Liberal Party, and that’s one of the reasons that we’re kicking off the convention with a party at Mercury Lounge, and we have Dixie Landers coming on Friday night [Jan 13].
Sheila Copps
 
We’re actually looking at setting up a tour office as far as the party goes and doing a lot more outreach, so we would actually be at Pride parades and different things in a more organized fashion, because people choose to be there individually, but it’s not organized. The party leaves it up to every individual, and what we’re trying to do is have a more concerted approach to public policy, and it’s certainly an area that can differentiate us from the current government, for sure.
 
Mike Crawley: What I’ve seen going on in Toronto in the past couple of months is an organization that’s formed – not like a commission. I don’t think we need necessarily more commissions, but a GLBT caucus, they’ve called it.

They’re starting to reach out to other ridings across Toronto and trying to reach out beyond Toronto, as well, to create other chapters, so they’re both an opportunity for those in that community to get together, but it’s also, more importantly, a way to give voice to some of the concerns, issues and priorities of that community, so that they can be better heard within the Liberal Party.
Mike Crawley

It’s also a chance for the Liberal Party to reach out to that community to people who maybe are involved with other parties, or more likely not involved in politics in general and say that right now, there is no more open a party than the federal Liberal Party, particularly over the next two years, and if you want to come in and influence policy, whether it’s on issues specific to your community or broader issues, now is the time to come in.
 
 
Ron Hartling: The party really hasn’t been reaching out to anybody for a long time, and the way that I do it, and the way that worked really successfully in Kingston, was to be open, be welcoming and give people who become relevant to the community in terms of championing the issues that matter in the community, and in doing so, open up meaningful volunteer opportunities.
Ron Hartling

That’s how you engage people, that’s how you get new members, that’s how you get new volunteers, and eventually, that’s how you get new donors, because the more that people feel that they’re making a real difference, the more likely they are to increase their involvement with the Liberal Party. In terms of the GLBT community, it’s getting involved in issues that matter, and that includes GLBT issues. The party needs to reach out at two different levels – it needs to reach out nationally in terms of the policies that it promotes, but it also has to do it locally, because it’s locally where people get involved.
Alexandra Mendes
 
Alexandra Mendes: I believe that the party has always been a very inclusive party in terms of LGBT rights and a very big promoter of LGBT rights. We had quite a number of caucus members who have been very strong promoters of LGBT rights, both as legislative and partisan measures. I know there are some outreach initiatives right now, one of them in Toronto – there’s the LGBT caucus that has just been created, and I’m a big supporter. I’ll help in any way I can, but the outreach is also going to have to go two ways, and I think it’s been a disappointment to many Liberals that the LGBT community hasn’t been as vocal in their support of Liberals as we would have hoped they would be in past elections – if I may be so blunt. For the Liberal Party, I don’t think there’s any question of going back on a stance for the Liberal Party for the last 40 years, and that has been a steady part of our policy base when in government, and I firmly believe that we should continue that, but the outreach definitely has to be two ways.
 
Charles Ward: I just feel that we have to accept people as people, and we just go about our business that way. I have no opinions on that specifically. I don’t differentiate between people as to these different issues. It’s live and let live, and as long as everybody just treats everybody as human beings, I’m fine with that, and I think it makes life simpler. 
Charles Ward



Share |


Reader Comments

These reader comments are posted directly. No editorial review is made prior to posting. Readers may contact the moderator with any complaints or concerns, and these will be reviewed within two business days.

 
...And the next Liberal Party President will be...
Being one of the last Gay men on the planet to understand a politician or his or her politics as they converse mincing words being Meli-Melo leaving your head in a spin because you are not sure what they actually said or did not mean; it comes down to whom you think is the Best lier or like me whom has the most trustable face if any. I am thankful to the Liberals(Correct me if I am wrong)for legalizing Homosexuality and Gay marriage. Having said that Mr ward with his slanted almost forced smile doesn't inspire trust. His non opinion on the question asked was extremely vague like someone saying your Gay, so what, next. Like it was a non issue(As important as it is). "I don't differentiate between people as to these different issues." Basically I understood he does not want to recognize Diversity of any kind. That ain't a "Good Thing" Martha! Mr Hartling, just mentioning the Queer word in a conversation does not make him believable. Again, no direct response to the question; "it's getting involved in the issues, and that includes Queer issues" Does he know of any? Vague vague vague, unlike his photo...I'm no fashionista but wearing red on a red background, overkill for the Can. red party. Mrs Mendes, "If I may be so Blunt" - Face alone comes close to trustable but that comment was inappropriate. It was as if she was mad at the commubnity for not showing more support in the past."But the outreach is also going to have to be two ways, I think it's been a disapointment to many Liberals that the Queer community hasn't been as vocal in their support." Well that would be the party's fault and you are not going to gain more votes by being angry at your voters.
Alan, Montreal Quebec
01/08/12 4:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Part 2 Liberal President to be
I'm going back and forth between the last 2 Mrs Copps and Mr Crawley. Well getting back to a trusting face, Mr Crawley looks likke he is having a bad hair day.(How many times must he throw his head to the side to keep his hair out of his eyes? Anybody got a Bobbypin?)Maybe he would be appealing to the younger Beiber crowd. Mrs Copps does give a more mature stance with her Ms.L'Oreal Warm Caramel color and her Bob type do. The pearls are a plus, classic. Oh ya back to credibility; Mr Crawleymentioned"What I have seen going on, A Queer caucaus is what the call it" shows his non involvement(Obviously not that important to him). Whereas mrs Copps did mention a closer involvement and is seemingly giving more importance to Queer agendas. Again nothing concrete. Mentioning she would like her party to participate in the parade in a more organized fashion, well, nice but, just marketing. Well here goes, Iny, Miny, Miny, Moe, catch a Liberal....Rock Paper, Scissors...
Alan, Montreal Que
01/08/12 11:33 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
A Party of the Past
The Lib-tards are dead. This will be their last president. That's what you get for betraying Canadians.
ron, Vancouver Bc
01/09/12 12:31 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Kinda mixed comments here
The community already has full legal equality. The biggest threat is still the Conservative Party gradually taking this away - witness the New "Foreign Ministry for Jesus" as the start of this erosion. So... defeating Stephen Harper with a majority, should be the #1 Queer issue right now, regardless of how that is achieved or which party makes it happen. Charles Ward comments are kinda dangerous...it sounds like he is making room for Religious exemptions to existing equality laws. He should be running for the Conservatives.
Jase, Mississauga ON
01/10/12 4:26 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Assessing risks
Jase, I agree that the establishment of the Office of Religious Freedom in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is a step backward for the separation of Church and State. But, I suspect its activities will be limited to criticizing countries like China when they imprison or persecute Christians or other religious minorities within their borders. I don't think the Office will be used to support fundamentalist religious governments in foreign countries that persecute LGBT people (that is contrary to positions taken by Harper and Baird at international forums like the Commonwealth). And, the Office won't affect LGBT people in Canada. The biggest "foreign" risk to LGBT people in Canada remains homophobic immigrants who come from countries that persecute or de-humanize LGBT people and who don't adopt Canadian values of tolerance after settling here (e.g., immigrants or children of immigrants who gay bash or who politically lobby against LGBT rights).
Ian, Toronto Ontario
01/10/12 8:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Wow Ian,
your minimizing the extreme and serious threat to LGBT people with a GOVERNMENT office of Religious Freedom just leaves me speechless.
Chris, Toronto Ontario
01/10/12 10:43 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Oh look....
a report in the Toronto Star in which the Harper Government, you know the one with a Freedom of Region Office, is now trying to dissolve gay marriages as illegal. But hey, I'm sure Ian everything is fine. There are NO connections to be made. No concerns to be had here and no hsitory with which to reference. And all is right with the world. ........................http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1114430--same-sex-marriages-of-non-resident-couples-not-legal-federal-justice-department?bn=1
Chris, Toronto Ontario
01/12/12 10:18 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Oh look...at what?
That artical concerns foreigners that got married here and are non residents. Not immigrants who live here, not Canadians abroad and not Canadians who live here. I'm tired of forigners trying to use of government services anyway and then expecting benifits from them. If these people wanted to get married that badly they should have immigrated here.
Tod, Regina SK
01/12/12 11:24 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yet another apologist
without eyes to see and ears to hear. This backdoor shift is exactly what former Prime-minister Jean Chretien warned about in December. Nothing to see here folks. Move along. Man oh man are we ever doomed. It's every man for himself.
Chris, Toronto Ontario
01/12/12 11:39 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Equal Marriage in now back into public debate
See how quickly Stephen Harper bought equal rights for gays back into the arena of public discussion......It is going to be a long and nasty 5 years for the Canadian Gay community.
Jase, Mississauga ON
01/12/12 1:15 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Post Your Comment!
Your Name:
(required)


City/Town:
(required)


Province:
(required)




Email Address:
(required)



For verification purposes only. Not for publication, nor released to any mailing list. (Privacy statement)

Title of your comment:
(required)


Your Comment: (max. 2000 characters)
(required)
characters remaining

 Refresh
Enter the code shown on the left (case-sensitive):
(required)




   
Click here to read guidelines

Guidelines for reader comments

Submissions go directly online, without being seen by editors. So, it’s important that you follow the laws against defamation. Do that by keeping your comments focussed on issues, and on your ideas and opinions. Do not get personal and do not defame others. If you see defamatory comments made in other people’s postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment must directly relate to the subject of the article.

Avoid confusing statements; express your thoughts clearly and succinctly so readers will understand your opinion. Do not post superficial comments, such as a short phrase or just a few words.

Do not post promotions of products, services or events. If you see such postings, report them to our moderator, who will investigate within two business days.

Your comment and name may also be published in an Xtra paper.

Publication of your comments on Xtra.ca or in an Xtra paper is not an endorsement of your views by Xtra.ca or Pink Triangle Press.