Canada's polygamy law to face court test
POLYGAMY / Two leaders of polygamous sect charged in BC
Jeremy Hainsworth / National / Thursday, January 08, 2009
Share |

Canada's law against polygamy faces a court test after the arrest Jan 7 of two of the leaders of a polygamous sect in Bountiful, BC.

BC Attorney General Wally Oppal says some legal experts believe polygamy charges won't withstand a constitutional challenge in Canada over the issue of freedom of religion.

"I've always taken the position that's a valid offence in law," he says. "And if someone says that it's contrary to their religion, let a judge make that decision."

Oppal says Winston Blackmore faces charges of committing polygamy with 20 women, while James Oler is accused of committing polygamy with two women.

Oppal says the case is about the exploitation of women.

"It's been with us for well over 20 years," Opal says. "The problem has always been the defence of religion has always been raised."

Micheal Vonn of the BC Civil Liberties Association says the case could go as far as the Supreme Court of Canada.

"I can't imagine how it wouldn't be a case that wouldn't be challenged vigorously on both sides," she said.

She calls the Criminal Code's polygamy provisions antiquated.

"They are a Victorian anachronism ... and ripe to topple," Vonn says.

VIEWPOINT:

 

Knives out for poly peeps
- Marcus McCann
The trial of a cultish leader of a tiny religious sect could very well be one of the most important legal battle of the next decade for gays and lesbians — and all people who have flirted with unconventional sexual expression. Will we be brave enough to tackle it?

Blackmore was long known as "the Bishop of Bountiful."

He runs an independent group of about 400 people in the hamlet just outside Creston, a stone's throw from the US border.

He once ran the Canadian wing of the Utah-based Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Blackmore was ejected from that group in 2003 by "Prophet" Warren Jeffs.

Jeffs is in jail in Arizona awaiting trial on four counts of being an accomplice to sexual conduct with a minor.

Blackmore acknowledges having numerous wives and dozens of children.

Oler is one of Jeff's followers.

While they all live on the same land, the community is sharply divided in its loyalties between the leaders. Family members are often forbidden to speak to each other depending upon where their allegiances are.

The Latter-day Saints church renounced polygamy in 1890, but several fundamentalist groups left the main church in order to continue the practice.

A special prosecutor was appointed last June to look into allegations of abuse at Bountiful.

As part of bail conditions, the men are barred from entering into or performing "celestial marriages" as they are known in the sect.

Both men were ordered to surrender their passports.

The West Coast Women's Legal Education and Action Fund welcomes the arrests.

"These charges will allow the courts, the government, the women of Bountiful and all Canadians to determine the boundaries of religious freedom when women's equality is at stake — a question of interest to many in the world today," says executive director Alison Brewin.
 



Share |


Reader Comments


 
Polygamy
For far too long, Winston Blackmore, polygamist supreme, has got away with the misleading statement that polygamy is protected under the freedom of religion provisions of the Charter. It is not. On 19 May 1976, Canada ratified the Protocol on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that everyone has the freedom to practise their religion subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law AND ARE NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS. In 1882, Canada adopted the Charter, which states in sections 15 and 28 that women have complete equality with men. Then, in 2002, Canada ratified the Protocol on the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,which states that polygamy contravenes women's equality rights, impoverishes them,and also harms their children.Polygamists, who claim they have a God-given right to collect women into harems, don't have a leg to stand on. As well, consider that the concubines in polygamists' families are not entitled to share in health insurance benefits, life insurance, spousal pensions, automatic division of property on the man's death, or income tax benefits. Not to mention the psychological pain of many women competing for the attentions of one man, while they themselves are not allowed to copy his sexual freedom and have many sexual partners. Let's kick this ancient, selfish, patriarchal practice into the garbage can of history, where it belongs. The year is 2008 AD, not 2008 BC!
Jancis M. Andrews, Sechelt BC
01/08/09 12:46 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Poly is legal
I'm not Muslim or Mormon, and have no personal interest in plural marriage. There can be no valid law against polygamy (or any consenting adult poly relationship). It's important to separate out the unrelated issues people are having with certain particular polygamists or groups (sexual abuse, rape, forced marriage, banishment) from the issue that keeps getting confused with them - polygamy. Those things are bad no matter who does them. It doesn't matter who they are married to. Polygamy isn't protected by religion, because polygamy isn't always based on religion. But it is protected for the same reasons same-sex marriage is protected - equality, freedom, and respect for individuals. People should be able to choose who they want to love, and form the groups they want to form, and the rest of us should butt out. It's just that simple. You'd think we, of all people, would eagerly and proudly defend that. Or are we just hypocrites?
Randy, Windsor ON
01/08/09 3:42 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Polygamy is RAPE
Polygamy inevitably, in all cultures that practices it, leads to: The rape of children, The rape of women, The devaluation of women, the dehumanization of women and overall misogynistic attitudes. It has nothing to do with same sex marriage. Arguments for same sex marriage are based on the fundamental equality of all human beings. Arguments for Polygamy are based on the misogynistic drive by a bunch of religious perverts to control, own, objectify and RAPE women and girls.
A Gay Man, Somewhere Western Canada
01/08/09 11:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Get real for a minute
The law of Polygamy does not simply protect "women and children from harm". It protects the whole legal system as well, it protects individual rights of equality, freedom and other important Charter Rights and Freedoms. Our entire property system for example is based upon no charter guarantees, however, married persons can for sure know with certainty that their belongings will only be split by two persons when they divorce. If spouses are free to just take off and marry or live in common law with another spouse.. without the first spouses permission.. or even the second or third spouses permission.. without divorcing first...ouch! that's gonna hurt the entire legal system. Consider what happens when the Criminal Code is not enforced. A married person could cohabitate or marry( without being divorced) with another person(s). Now you have three or four or ten or twenty "spouses" in family court property law. The entire process can continue to hundreds of persons. Now consider what happens when a "couple" break up.. the other spouses, children,grandparents and other interested parties get each their own lawyers, judges, diferent provinces of residence..and on and on.. a complete breakdown of the legal system occurs. Family law states that a couple is in a conjugal relationship to the exclusion of all others. Only divorce can allow persons to begin to have "capacity" to consent to enter another legal family situation of spousal relationship. If the government allows ALL persons to flaut this law... whoa....lookout family law! Look out Canada! the sky really would fall.. to the lawyers..at great harm to citizens. ( kinda like the fall of Rome)
Stephen, Ottawa Ontario
01/09/09 5:53 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Above the Canadian Law
How can anyone justify that an insignificant man like Winston Blackmore is above Canadian Law; the Canadian Attorney General, The Supreme Court of Canada, Lawyers, The Canadian Constitution who makes a public statement saying ``It has taken three AGs, many special prosecutors, and millions and millions of taxpayer dollars, almost 19 years to arrive at the conclusion that Fundamentalist Mormons want to practice the fundamentals of their faith.`` He hides behind religion to exploit young women, to sexually slave them and have them submit to his perversions in the name of religion.
Virginia, Edmonton Alberta
01/15/09 4:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Poly law clouds rather than clarifies
Stephen -- interestingly, a group of legal scholars has made the opposite argument: that _not_ recognizing polygamous marriages leaves the court and the people involved in the muck, in legal limbo where the wives are vulnerable during divorce, inheritance, immigration, etc. The report, specifically about foreign polygamous marriages, is very articulate: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1023896
Marcus McCann, Ottawa ON
01/16/09 7:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Inevitable
The moment that marriage between two members of the same-sex was made legal in Canada, marriage itself was rendered meaningless in Canadian law. It means everything - it means nothing. This has been discussed in federally paid for law papers and foreseen for years (Bailey). Can't have it both ways (so to speak). Tough luck .
lwestin, Charlottetown PEI
01/25/09 3:03 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
polygamy is already legal in saskatchewan
A saskatchewan judge and Attorney generals office aready ruled a person could have more than one spouse under section 51 of the saskatchewan family property act. No Polygamy charges and no freedom of religion arguments are required. It is the law that it is allowed without any penalties.
Jonathon, Lethbridge alberta
01/27/09 8:01 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Freedom
I agree with the Libertarians, at least when it comes to adults practicing polygamy. I support the right of consenting adults to practice polygamy on the grounds that the State has no place in telling consenting adults what to do in their private romantic lives. The law is there to prevent harm, and I see very little evidence of harm coming out of Bountiful, just a bunch of people happily enjoying their lives. Although the polygamy ban is opposed by many on freedom-of-religion grounds, to me it certainly doesn't have to be, and in fact I'd characterize the religious argument as secondary to the libertarian one. Should Atheist adults not have the right to love each other in their own consenting manner? To those who scream against polygamy, I beseech you to please mind your own business. I get so tired of hearing people compensate for their shallow lives by worrying about other peoples' private business. Why would monogamous individuals rail with such vitriolic hate towards responsible polygamists? I'm sorry, I just don't understand it. If they are opposed on religious grounds, too bad, it's a free, secular country. If they're opposed because they fear change to how interpersonal relationships work for SOME people, too bad, the world evolves. Unless there is some direct, demonstrable harm, it's none of your business. And my sentiments are shared by many fellow young people, who're tired of the contradictions they see in a system that encourages freedom, enlightenment, and rationality in some areas of life but not others. And if the Supreme Court lacks the courage to protect peoples' freedom to live their lives however they see fit so long as they're not hurting others - if the Court wants to uphold grouping polygamists as CRIMINALS along with murders, rapists, and fraudsters - then I say it's time for peaceful civil disobedience against a bad law.
Dave, Calgary AB
02/05/09 10:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Canadian Polygamy
Freedom, I kindof agree with you except for one thing. If Saskatchewan judges and Saskatchewan Attorney Generals' can break the Federal law.. then why do laws exist?
JustinM, Halifax Nova Scotia
02/15/09 4:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Times are changing!!
first polygamy is rape? wtf I saw someone bring up the topic of the marriage laws being amended, more like re written here is a tid bit of info for yah all, The laws related to incest and marriage were also changed at the same time.... it is now legal to marry your first cousin or you nephew/niece in canada.. Back to the polygamy issue... In university I met the loves of my life, they were a Bi-sexual female couple and it all started when they approached me for a sexual encounter a(3some). And it just grew from there. they love each other and they both love me; and I love both of them.. Its now almost 10yrs later and we have a wonderful life.. 3 above average incomes,a very nice house 2 beautiful children, who have no problems having 2 mothers. We are not legally married but live as a family.. they both consider themselves my wives and I their husband, we all have matching bands as a symbol of our love to each other. Our neighbors and friends don't seem to concerned about it, I would dare say a couple are even envious. Are we breaking the LAW? LOL We don't think so. all the negative comments and bashing just goes to show there are a lot of prudes out there. Times are changing people.. at one time the man was the bread winner and the woman stayed home, still the case in some families. with the economy changing the way it is even 2 income families are just making it.. With 3 incomes our home is paid for, our vehicles are paid for and we have collage funds set aside for our kids. we go on yearly vacations as a family. Life is good!! (We are not religious) Polygamy means rape? that comment is messed up.. Ok statutory rape MIGHT happen in the religious communes or enclaves, I can't say.. But on another note.. The age of sexual consent in Canada was raised in 2007 I believe, from 14 to 16 years of age. you can also legally marry at the age of 16. IT IS LEGAL for a 50yr old man to marry a 16yr old woman. People might see it as morally wrong but it is not illegal.
Mark, Saskatoon Sask
03/13/09 3:11 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.