Canada's healthcare system is homophobic, says group
HUMAN RIGHTS / Six queers file human rights complaint
Julia Garro / National / Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Share |

Gens Hellquist, Art Zoccole and Sheri McConnell at a press conference on Feb 17 to announce the human rights complaints against Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada.
(Julia Garro)
A group of six Canadian queers is taking on homophobia in Canada's healthcare system by filing a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

"The constitution of this country guarantees equality to all Canadians in all areas but that still does not hold for gay, lesbian, bisexual Canadians when it comes to our health," said Gens Hellquist, one of the complainants and executive director of the Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition, at a press conference in Toronto on Feb 17.

"We're tired of watching many senseless premature deaths in our community that result from homophobia while government health agencies sit on the sidelines. It's time both agencies live up to their missions and visions when it comes to gay, lesbian, bisexual Canadians."

Hellquist, along with fellow complainants Art Zoccole of Toronto and Sheri McConnell of St John's, were on hand for the press conference. The other complainants are Vancouver's Phillip Banks, Saskatoon's Charlotte Rochon and Montreal's Daniel Lanouette.

The complaint, presented as a 10-page document, charges that the government agencies are ignoring queer health issues that have been brought to their attention through multiple, government-funded reports.

"Over the past 10 years [Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada] have contracted with experts on gay, lesbian, bisexual health to produce studies on the many health issues that are endemic to our community and ask for recommendations how to address those issues," said Hellquist. "To date none of those reports have been acted on and none of the numerous recommendations have been acted upon.

"Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada have developed policies, strategies and funding initiatives for most other populations in this country but they seem unwilling to do the same for gay, lesbian, bisexual Canadians even though we have one of the poorest health statuses in this country."

The report's list of health issues affecting queer Canadians includes lower life expectancy than the average Canadian, suicide, higher rates of substance abuse, depression, inadequate access to care and HIV/AIDS.

"There are all kinds of health issues that are endemic to our community," said Hellquist. "We have higher rates of anal cancer in the gay male community, lesbians have higher rates of breast cancer. These are all issues that need to be addressed."

However no specific objectives are laid out in the document. "This complaint is really about social policy and about funding strategies and very much as a broader social policy level, rather than at the frontline interactive level because the responsibilities of Health Canada exist at a social policy level," said McConnell.

Hellquist said the complaint is just the first step in increasing the pressure on the healthcare agencies to address queer issues.

"This is a starting point, to get attention because we haven't got attention other ways," he said. "Quite frankly this isn't likely to be our last step."

To date the Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition's attempts to advance queer health concerns with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada haven't been taken seriously, Hellquist told the press conference.

"We've made numerous attempts to meet with health ministers and had no luck," he said. "They set up meetings with other bureaucrats within the department who make all kinds of promises to us, none of which they carry out.... We've made numerous attempts to make some changes to develop a partnership with the department and every indication is that they're not interested. Needless to say we're frustrated."

In the meantime Hellquist charges that the healthcare system has been equating gay health with HIV/AIDS. "When Health Canada or anyone talks about health issues in the gay/lesbian/bisexual communities they're talking about HIV/AIDS and the reality is there is more GLBT people in this country who die of suicide each year than die from AIDS, there are more who die early deaths from substance abuse than die of HIV/AIDS."

The human rights complaint isn't just about getting the attention of the government and the healthcare system.

"We want other gay and lesbian and bisexual Canadians to write letters to their members of Parliament, to do something, not just to leave it up to us six who have made this complaint but get behind us and join us in this new battle that we're starting," said Zoccole.

"This is as much a call to our community to get active on this issue," said Hellquist. "We've become complacent over the last decade or so.... When HIV/AIDS first appeared and was ignored by our healthcare system we took action. We marched, we did die-ins, we were loud and vocal about it. I think we've become very complacent.

"It seems that... now that we can get married everyone assumes that we don't have any issues any more. A lot of the deaths that occur in our community are hidden, we don't see them. Those of us who are working on the front lines see them and I'm tired of watching my community die."


Share |


Reader Comments


 
Is there more?
This article seems unusually short. Could you maybe give some backed-up concrete examples illustrating the complaint? Nothing concrete is given here until the third last paragraph. And how about queer friendly medical places, like Sherbourne Health Centre. What is there take on this complaint?
chris d, toronto on
02/17/09 5:05 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
gay lesbian bisexual Canadians
Hmm what's missing?
Sarah Menace, Toronto ON
02/17/09 10:20 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Unfortunately...
...gender identity and expression are not yet prohibited grounds of discrimination listed in the Canadian Human Rights Act, although the NDP is working to change that situation. It may therefore not have been possible to file a human rights complaint on the health discrimination transgender, transsexual, and genderqueer people face. A Quebec government report on discrimination against the LGBT community in society and official agencies included information on discrimination against trans people (as well as LGB people) in the health care system. Here is the link: http://www.cdpdj.qc.ca/fr/publications/docs/rapport_homophobie.pdf , although it is currently only available in French.
Matt, Montreal Quebec
02/19/09 12:46 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
correcting Matt
While no express grounds have yet been enacted to protect trans people, there is abundant case law, including decisions of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, which have established that trans people are protected from discrimination under the ground of "sex" and where the individual's circumstances warrant it, the ground of "disability." So, there simply must be another reason why trans health issues and the complete system failures concerning trans health are not being addressed in this complaint. A lack of supporting data (evidence) could be one explanation. There may be other, much less benign explanations though, if we look to history for guidance.
Shannon Blatt, Ottawa Ontario
02/19/09 8:34 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Funny
Speaking only for the organ and blood policies, it's always funny when people say "there is no scientific basis for so and so" and then offer no scientific evidence of their claim, OR they offer the evidence that supports their claim while ignoring the other evidence. Also (again regarding organ and blood policies), I think it's funny that the groups fighting those poolicies charge the medical establishment with homophobia for claiming that MSM males have a higher prevalence of HIV and other STDs, and yet that "homophobic" claim is partly the basis for this complaint! Maybe I'm reading something wrong here.
cd, toronto on
02/21/09 10:11 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Check your writing before you post
Hi CD. Oops, it sounds like your head accidentally spilled out onto this comment page. Could you please make your comments more articulate? I'd really like to respond, but I have no idea what to say. I didn't see your "there is no scientific basis for so and so" quote anywhere in the previous article, nor in the comments section so I'm really at a loss when it comes to adding to what could be a very good discussion. I also didn't see a discussion about blood donation, and your comment on it carries virtually no argument. Please add some clarity and then I think people, including myself, will be delighted to respond in kind.
Adam Graham, Vancouver British Columbia
02/24/09 8:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
sorry
My comment is for the linked article - the ten page document. Sorry if you got wet from the spill.
cd, toronto on
02/25/09 12:50 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
gimme a break
And I've just noted that they changed this article (the Xtra article by Garro) since publishing it originally. That is VERY sneaky. There was nothing in it about HIV at all when this article was published, and suddenly, after my comment on the 21st there is magically more addressing that very issue. Gimme a break. AND the complaint (the ten-page document linked above) very clearly states that "There is no real scientific basis" for current policies, yet offers nothing scientific to back up that claim.
cd, toronto on
02/25/09 1:02 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Had To Wonder As Well
I found it rather odd, or maybe not, to see no included mention of people who are transexual in this case. Considering, though some mmay not be aware, a woman who was transexual fought and won within the CHC years ago. The lack of consistent positive medical support provided people who are transexual through out this country is sickening. Far too many times it becomes up to the person to educate the doctor, if that is they are even willing to take that person in as a patient. I see this "mistake" as a clear and continued devide between those in the general gay/lesbian community towards those in the transexual and transgender communities.
femme, toronto ontario
02/28/09 2:58 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Trans people omitted ... why?
I agree with femme that the presumable purposeful exclusion of the Trans communities is evidence of a clear and continuing division between those in the general gay/lesbian community and trans folk. To me, it is an affront and unacceptable ...
bodhi, Toronto Ontario
02/28/09 6:16 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Discrimination of Transsexuals
The exclusion of a provision to prohibit discrimination against the transsexual community is shameful.
Lynne, London england
03/01/09 5:28 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Gender Non-Conformity is Gay after all
Tucked away in the definition of homophobia on page 1 of the complaint is a must interesting claim: "gender non-conformity" is part of "all things associated" with gays and lesbians and "homosexuality in general." I had thought this rather more positive statement of "gender variant" to be the definition of transgender, not usually associated with sexual orientation but rather with transsexualism. Something has changed. The Canadian Rainbow Health Coalition, like Egale Canada, includes trans people in its mandate, but now, as Egale Canada, it has shown this inclusion to be nominal at best. The very complaint it makes of the government regarding lack of services for gay, lesbian, bisexual and, it now seems, transgender Canadians demonstrates the very lack of these self-same services--and an advocate for these as well--for transsexual people--now clearly separated from transgender people. Some transgender people, who also claim to be transsexual, will probably be placed in a quandary, a crisis possibility--but a crisis is a place for positive change. I'm not unhappy with the change in the "lay of the land" regarding gay, lesbian, bisexual and now transgender people--and the quite clear exclusion of transsexual people from this umbrella. It is becoming untenable to further maintain the notion of a "transgender umbrella" that includes transsexual people in the face of what will, I believe, rapidly become fundamental usage in Canada. As a transsexual person I have been working to articulate the basis for a true coalition among GLBT people--not the policing of a single identity this complaint is but the latest example of. There is an opportunity coming; I am making the best use of it. I suggest others do, too.
Jessica Freedman, Ottawa Ontario
03/01/09 8:46 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Confusing
I can understand the anal cancer due to more frequent activity back there, but I don't understand the higher rate of breast cancer in lesbians, could that be somehow related to hormonal differences compared to the norm population that correlate with lesbianism or something?
Jordan, Toronto Ontario
03/03/09 4:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.