Archie Comics' history of whitewashing, censorship & the religious right
MOUTHPIECE / In the button-down world of Riverdale, Kevin Keller will fit right in
Lisa Foad / National / Monday, April 26, 2010
Share |

At long last, Archie Comics (AC) — the behemoth of PG teen spirit in the pen-and-ink industry — will be furnishing Riverdale, honeyed home of Archie and the Gang, with its first fag. The story — which breaks on September 1 via the Veronica series — follows spoiled-rotten tempest Veronica Lodge as she attempts to snatch the heart of Kevin Keller, the clean-cut, golden-haired (and, unbeknownst to Veronica, homo) hunk new to Riverdale High.

Says Archie co-CEO, Jon Goldwater: “The introduction of Kevin is just about keeping the world of [AC] current and inclusive. Archie’s hometown of Riverdale has always been a safe world for everyone. It just makes sense to have an openly gay character in Archie comic books.”

It does make sense. But let’s be honest: the only “safety” for which the world of Riverdale has been known since its 1942 premiere is its sterility. Indeed, it wasn’t until 1974 that the comic got its first character of colour, African-American Chuck Clayton. And while recent years have seen further diversification of the cast (Raj Patel, Tomoko Yoshido), these characters are “safely” sideliners who “safely” fuck one another.

Sure, Archie has recently begun knocking boots with Valerie Brown, the African-American bassist of Josie and the Pussycats. But as Chris Sims (of ComicsAlliance.com) and Dwayne McDuffie (ex-Archie writer) note, AC has a history of “re-colouring” potential black characters as Caucasian — most notably, in 1992 and 2008. Both characters in question were teenaged black males slated to court white girls — corn-fed Betty and ritzy Cheryl Blossom, respectively. What’s at stake in the world of Riverdale, then, is the security of straight white masculinity.

To that end, a queer in Riverdale doesn’t bode well.

In fact, in 2003, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa’s homo romp through Riverdale, a play which featured a flaming Archie — was nearly quashed hours before opening when Atlanta-based Dad’s Garage Theatre received an ultimatum: halt production or face litigation.

“[Archie Comics] thought if Archie was portrayed as being gay, that would dilute and tarnish his image,” says Sean Daniels, the theatre’s artistic director. After a mad-scramble rewrite, Archie’s Weird Fantasy became Weird Comic Book Fantasy and hit the stage. (The 2006 GLAAD-Media-Award-nominated play is now titled Golden Age.)

Indeed, AC has always been batting from the ultraconservative right. Co-founder John L Goldwater led the 1954 establishment of the Comics Code Authority — the heavy-handed goliath of comic-book censorship (which emerged in the wake of those comic-books-and-juvenile-delinquency congressional hearings).

And, of course, there was the 1973-1982 Christian-right series that they published in addition to the “regular” Archie comics. Witness as an evangelical Archie and the Gang spread the word! When questioned by The New York Times, Goldwater explained that the deal with Spire Christian Comics suited AC’s “wholesome family message.”

Michael Silberkleit (AC co-owner and publisher until his 2008 death) later noted that the Christian series wasn’t meant for routine readers: “One thing we don’t want is people telling us they got an Archie comic to be entertained and they’re being preached to.”

Nope, nobody likes a soapbox. But the Riverdale world order — heterosexual amour-lite organized around white masculinity’s fear of blackness — is an evangelist in its own right. AC’s youth audience makes this all the more problematic. As Salon.com’s Douglas Wolk notes, “[S]tories for children don’t just reflect the world, they shape it.” 

So, while a queer in Riverdale is long overdue, the inclusion of Kevin Keller is hardly queer. In fact, it’s the safest bet for a comic bent on preserving straight white masculinity. How? Because mainstream culture’s fear of “deviant” (read: black and/or gay) male sexuality consistently renders these bodies politely asexual – and therefore “safe.” (The cultural acceptability of lesbians, on the other hand, depends upon triple-X fantasy, namely straight masculinity’s ability to imagine itself sandwiched in between — a lascivious insistence that’s too lewd for Riverdale). 

We need only look to the wildly sexphobic backlash generated by Adam Lambert’s deliciously deviant performance at the 2009 American Music Awards (which featured boy-boy make-out and briefly suggested a blowjob) to remind us just how rigidly gay male sexuality is policed: the West Coast broadcast was censored; Lambert’s upcoming ABC performances were cancelled; ABC began tightening its performer contracts (to ensure live shows mimic rehearsals); and homophobes everywhere denounced Lambert as “obscene” and “disgusting.” 

Riverdale’s Kevin Keller might be gay. But he’s not queer.


Share |


Reader Comments


 
So what if he's not queer.
First of all, sept 1st is a long ways away. Maybe we should wait until we've met the character for a while before we pass judgement? Also, I find it offensive that you would say something like, ''Kevin Keller might be gay. But he’s not queer.'' That sentence is nothing more then pure bigotry on the part of so called, ''queer'' writers, leader and activists towards gay men that tend to conform to ''staright'' behaviors and ''fit in''. Your assesment is akin to saying, ''Presedent Obama might be black, but he's not a brother.'' Well,let me be the first to appologize for Kevin Keller, how dare he not live up to your expectaions of how a gay man should act and think...what ever that may be since nobody can really figure out what the hell ''queer'' even means.
Ike, Edmonton Alberta
04/26/10 10:38 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
I'm not surprised
I'm not surprised that Xtra would attack the new gay character in the Archie comics. Xtra is all about attacking and condemning gay people who don't conform to their views (e.g., gay people who believe that deliberately infecting another person with HIV should be a crime, gay people who believe that the Pride parade should not be hijacked by the "Queer Anti-Israel group" and their leftist agenda in support of Muslim homophobes, gay people who don't believe that Jack Layton would make the best Prime Minister).
Sam, Toronto Ontario
04/26/10 11:22 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
The lunatic left are the real bigots
The Toronto queer leftists don't accept Gay Kevin because he's white and male. The leftists are the true bigots and most people realize this.
ron, Vancouver Bc
04/26/10 11:36 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
What the hell is wrong with you?
There's nothing wrong with this character being a regular joe who happens to be gay. Would you have been more satisfied if he was fucked up on meth, flitting about town in gold lame booty shorts and sucking off mister weatherbee on the sly? Just because something is PG, it doesn't have to be wrong. This IS after all marketed to kids. fuckwit.
Patrick, Toronto ON
04/27/10 5:35 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Asexuality
Lisa Foad makes a good point concerning how gay characters are often portrayed as asexual, because that makes some straight people more comfortable. I don't think it's just straight men either, who have this problem, unfortunately. No announcement has been made about one or more romantic same-sex suitors for Kevin Keller. Archie was never for a second without a love interest, or two or more. We'll have to wait and see I guess how they develop Kevin Keller's character and life in Riverdale. Hopefully we will keep moving forward, showing gay men as fully human, with strong, beautiful sexual desires, equal to the way straight characters are portrayed in this comic book. I ask for nothing more, nothing less.
Clint, Thunder Bay Ontario
04/29/10 2:29 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Yawn!
Yawn! Does anybody with more than half a brain in their head actually read this stuff? I thought that the only people who looked at Archie stuff resided in Cloud Cuckoo Land. It must be a really slow day at Xtra if you need to publish something about Archie and Company. There is plenty of more interesting stuff in the American gay press and on the ILGA website so could we please have more serious stories in here. Yawn!
Yours Truly, Toronto Ontario
04/29/10 3:52 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Nice work, Lisa
As a prof once told me "a good argument is a nuanced argument" and Lisa's work is consistently well thought through and nuanced. I don't understand the hating that goes on when someone comes across something they disagree with. Can't you just argue the other side without being nasty? There's also the whole other problem of people not getting the difference between news and opinion, but that's just basic media literary - a work in progress. A lot of (especially online) writing these days is nothing more than sloganeering, cant or reaction, whether left, right or tinged with pink. And yes, it's easy to dismiss pop culture stuff like comic books, but it is a social barometer of sorts, if you need a pointy-headed excuse to care. I don't want to read Archie or the tabloid press about LiLo, but I appreciate having someone of Foad's obvious intellect and observational skills do it for me. I do wish that the comments would engage with the piece, rather than tossing around epithets about the writer. The worst part of that is that it's just boring.
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
05/01/10 2:57 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Suck it, soldier!
Patrick asks "Would you have been more satisfied if he was fucked up on meth, flitting about town in gold lame booty shorts and sucking off mister weatherbee on the sly?". Personally, yes, I would like that, but lose the gold lame shorts. Maybe military issue green y-fronts? Mr. Weatherbee used to be in the Marine Corp, Wikipedia tells us, so it could make for some interesting dialogue even as it works a dog-eared porn trope. Presumably it will involve punishment at the beginning, and a lot of yelling aimed at emasculation, before they all figure out that they like it, after all, and yes, he does like that cock ramming his cake-hole, or something. Sometimes nothing feels fresher than a tarted-up cliché, done well. But I won't steal your idea. Why don't you storyboard it, Patrick, and let's see where it goes?! (further to my previous comments, I think the real story is that, well, this is a story at all! The Onion nailed it perfectly with their 'what do you think? piece - check it out).
Alex MacLean, Toronto ON
05/01/10 3:21 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
We wait to see
Although there no gaurntee that he will be anything more than one time charecter. Let alone have any real affect on Riverdale. Although I like this move becuase at least they are trying it. like the marriagearc I thought I would never live to see this. I wish they would bring Betty/Reggie intercation back to the comic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR_H0tlhkmw I miss them so much I made a vid about them. Sad I know.
Gotapenname, Tor ON
05/10/10 7:23 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.