Anti-porn feminists
PERSONAL/POLITICAL / Women's conference still divided on sex work
Ariel Troster / National / Friday, October 31, 2008
Share |

It's 8pm on a Saturday in Montreal, and a group of women unfurl a banner in front of hundreds of activists, gathered over plates of raw vegetables and chickpea dip. They raise their fists in the air, triumphant after having picketed a peep show on St Catherine Street and proceed to lead the crowd in a cheer of "no to porn, no to prostitution."

While this sounds like a scene out of Bonnie Klein's 1980 anti-porn documentary Not a Love Story, it actually took place a couple of weeks ago. I was in Montreal for the Waves of Resistance conference, which brought together more than 500 women under the age of 35 to share skills and dream up creative ways to fight the right-wing swing here in Canada and around the world. The impromptu cheer was only one out of more than 30 actions carried out by conference participants over the Thanksgiving weekend, and thankfully, many of the women in the audience seemed equally as puzzled and appalled as I was by the display.

There were other snapshots that weekend — a few of them infuriating, but the vast majority inspiring. What else do you expect when you throw together the raw power of hundreds of women aged 14 to 35? When you combine days of debate and discussion, too few hours of sleep and massive differences in terms of age, experience, language, sexual orientation and familiarity with feminism, you are bound to run into a few roadblocks.

It was a good wake-up call for me. It reconfirmed my conviction that feminism isn't dead, but it also exposed the cleavages that are still present in the movement a generation after they almost tore it apart. The thorny issues of sex work and pornography continue to divide women in collective meetings, at rallies and on the plenary floor of conventions like Waves of Resistance.

When these issues bubbled to the surface in Montreal, my first instinct was to roll my eyes and mutter, "Didn't we have this debate in 1982?" And then in the same breath I remembered that, when these conversations first captured the women's movement, I was only a toddler and many of the participants in the conference hadn't even been born yet.

My sense of activist lineage comes from being raised by feminist parents, from conversations with older activists, and from my somewhat obsessive self-study of feminist and queer history. I have to wonder if each generation of women will struggle with the same issues, or if at some point we'll have achieved enough of a consensus to roll up our sleeves and actually challenge the laws that continue to condemn sex workers to violence and intimidation.

My chosen community has a pretty specific set of norms. We are pro-choice, pro-sex and trans-positive. But I have often wondered if, by rejecting so much of second-wave feminism for its transgressions on porn and sex, we've thrown out the baby with the bathwater. Have we abandoned the important work that older feminists did to counter sexism in the media, set up shelters and campaign for affordable housing and childcare?

These issues dominated the workshop schedule at the Montreal conference, and the one workshop on the sex industry didn't include any representatives from sex workers and, notably, excluded the women from Stella — a Montreal organization that has been fighting for decriminalization of prostitution for more than a decade.

Surely the women's movement has advanced to the point that we can make the distinction between human trafficking and consensual sexual activity. If you talk to any sex worker, they will likely acknowledge the complex ways that societal expectations of women and the misogynist attitudes of both their customers and the police contribute to an unsafe work environment. But the only way to advance the debate with compassion and a dose of reality is to speak with sex workers not for them — something that the organizers of the Montreal conference failed to do.

There's no denying the power of a 20-year-old's rage. I spent a decade in Doc Marten boots, rejecting what I saw as heterosexist assumptions about beauty and sexuality. Young women have every right to rage against the patriarchy and reclaim their bodies from unrealistic and sexist expectations. But when they project their rage onto strippers and sex workers, they misdirect their anger and alienate women who could benefit from our solidarity.

While the final manifesto adopted by the Waves of Resistance participants stops short of calling for the decriminalization of prostitution, it does clearly describe "women in the sex trade" as being part of the feminist movement. Too bad the performers from the peep show on St Catherine St weren't part of the conference. Their voices would have made our conversations so much richer.



Share |


Reader Comments


 
trading Docs for Blundstones... and back again
I've gone back and forth on this issue over the past 16 years or so. I identify as pro-sex worker but have become increasingly anti proliferation of hetero-normative male-gaze-dominated internet porn. "Not a Love Story" was made pre-internet. When I watched it in a women's studies class in 1994 we were barely aware of the 'net and it's potential. Years later, some refer to internet porn as the 'crack cocaine' of sex addiction. I know that only 3 to 6% of the population is vulnerable to the addictive qualities of 'net porn. And there's probably lots more people who are vulnerable to the addictive qualities of nicotine, alcohol or heroin - but I also wouldn't call myself quite PRO-nicotine/alcohol/heroine either. I'll quaff a few beers and freely admit it ain't exactly good for me, ifyaknowwhatimean. I'm dismayed by the pornification of North American culture as it has seemingly co-opted the feminist movement in the name of a very narrow version of femininity called *girl power*. I feel like I CAN be sex-positive and celebrate the wonderful and diverse human experiences that come from sex while being wary many of the manifestations of mainstream porn. To me, porn is like bottled water: some people took something that should be free and healthy and available to all and sold it back to us. And just as bottled water is often less drinkable than the stuff from my tap - porn is ever more hard to swallow. I'd love to talk to you more about this topic!
Jenn Farr, Ottawa Ontario
10/31/08 5:57 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
That's the challenge
I totally hear ya Jenn. When I see the images of young women out there, a lot of it makes me nauseous. What about sending the message to young girls that they are foxy exactly the way they are and brainy to boot? A lot of mainstream porn doesn't turn my crank and it contributes to a very narrow perception women's sexuality ... I think you can be pro-porn, anti-censorship and supportive of sex workers, while also criticizing the images in mainstream culture. A lot of the women at the Waves of Resistance conference were concerned about hyper-sexualization of young girls. But the question is, how do we approach this issue from a sex-positive perspective that helps young women express their own desires and take the power back? I am sure you agree that turning against strippers is far too simplistic a response ...
Ariel Troster, Ottawa ON
10/31/08 8:27 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
in agreement
Yeah, I TOTALLY agree that turning again strippers or any sex workers is counter-productive. I'd certainly value a discussion that includes ALL stakeholders. Too bad I'm just one year older than the 'young' Feminist cut-off. ;-)
Jenn Farr, Ottawa Ontario
11/03/08 3:06 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
YES YES
I was at the Rebelles conference too, and I was so appalled by the anti-sex worker group, I would have walked out had I not been in an unfamiliar city. :) I was glad to know that the majority of the rest of my group (we came from NB) was equally put out by the anti-sex attitude on diplay. We are just now starting to debrief on our impressions of the conference and I'm sure that in the coming weeks we will be talking about this at length. I just wanted to say THANK YOU for writing this article - I think that there is hope for the feminist movement yet if we can get these issues out in the air and try to come to some consensus. The solidarity of our sex-worker sisters is INTEGRAL to the movement, especially in a time when feminism is moving more confidently towards intersectionality. Thank you thank you thank you for writing this.
Peggy Cooke, Fredericton New Brunswick
11/12/08 8:07 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
what do you mean pro-sex
I agree that feminism is about protecting women's rights including those of any sex-workers. I was at the conference and my workshop rally was perfomed in front of a peep-show. Def: a short pornographic film shown in a small coin-operated booth No life performers. This was targeted towards the industry and its exploiters. The phrases used were :"no more exploitation of young girls and women." And "women are not for sale" I would like to know if this is attacking sex-workers. And also, what do you mean pro-sex.
Yasmin, Hamilton ON
11/13/08 6:23 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Uncomfortable Action
Thanks for your article. I was actually a part of the action which protested in front of a peep show and was very uncomfortable with it. In fact even in our small group there was debate...which is why we ended up camping out in front of a peep show rather than a strip club (this was a compromise which was made). It is certainly important to recognize that these are still important issues and divisions among feminists. I also noticed the continued exclusion of sex workers. Hopefully these are things that can be addressed at the next meeting in 2011.
Lisa, Hamilton Ontario
11/13/08 10:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Uncomfortable Action
Thanks for your article. I was actually a part of the action which protested in front of a peep show and was very uncomfortable with it. In fact even in our small group there was debate...which is why we ended up camping out in front of a peep show rather than a strip club (this was a compromise which was made). It is certainly important to recognize that these are still important issues and divisions among feminists. I also noticed the continued exclusion of sex workers. Hopefully these are things that can be addressed at the next meeting in 2011.
Lisa, Hamilton Ontario
11/13/08 10:44 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Great questions
Thanks to those of you who were at the conference for responding! I hope you got from the tone of my article that I didn't intend to attack younger feminists who might have been participating in their first action. I understand the initial instinct to protest a peep show or a strip club, but I would like us to think a bit deeper about the implications of those actions. Lisa and Yasmin -- thanks for telling me a bit more about the debate that happened in your small group. It relieves me a bit to find out that you specifically chose not to protest a place where women were actually working but instead went for a video peep show. But there are still women who consented to appear in those films. We may not like the imagery they present (I certainly am not a big fan), but we need to be careful that we aren't calling for censorship of pornography. The queer community has seen time and time again that well-meaning laws that seek to distinguish "good" versus "bad" sexual imagery always end up repressing queer literature and non-mainstream sexualities (look up the Little Sisters case for a perfect example). Can we object to the way that porn reproduces misogynistic images of women? Sure! But we need to do this in solidarity with the women who work in the industry. What reforms are they hoping for? How can we support their struggles to make their workplaces fairer and safer? What can we do to support feminist and queer women who are working to create porn that represents images of different bodies and gender identities? The answer isn't a wholesale ban on the industry or a one-off protest. The questions -- and solutions -- require much more careful thought.
Ariel Troster, Ottawa ON
11/13/08 11:15 AM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Response
Ariel I didn't think that your article was meant as an attack and actually really enjoyed it. However, I did find your response to Yasmin and my comments was more than a little insulting. Please do not assume that this was my first action - it most certainly wasn't. Also, I would hope that you could see from my comments that there was a considerable amount of discomfort by some of the members of my group despite the compromise. I actually think the larger problem was linked to the structure of the first day. While I agree that spontaneous action is sometimes necessary, I found that throwing together a bunch of strangers and rushing them into an action was very irresponsible and often meant that dominant personalities determined what the action actually looked like. While overall I found Waves of Resistance to be a great experience, this was very problematic for me (and I made this clear to the organizers in my feedback). I am sorry if these comments sound confrontational - this is not my intention at all. I simply wanted you to know a bit more about what led to that action. Finally, I think you raise some really important questions - I just wanted you to know that some of these questions were raised by members of the group that day as well.
lisa, Hamilton Ontario
11/15/08 2:55 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.
Agreed!
Hi Lisa, I agree with you 100% that the structure of the conference led to unthoughtful actions -- I also shared this privately with the organizers. We need the time to think and talk and muddle through difficult issues. Hitting the streets is great, but it's potentially dangerous if we participate in knee-jerk actions without considering the broader implications. I am happy to hear that there was dissent from within these workshops -- I wouldn't expect any less from a group of young kick-ass feminists!
Ariel Troster, Ottawa ON
11/16/08 12:13 PM EST
Report this comment to moderator.