Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Weapons? They were supposed to be decorative.

Police Chief Bill Blair used a cache of household items seized over the weekend to justify the force with which they disrupted protests. Prominent among the “potential weapons” were bamboo poles, the CBC reports.

But poles confiscated by police were never intended as weapons, their owners say. Had they not been confiscated, they would have been used to fly Pride flags at a picnic in Cawthra Park.

Michael Went and Doug Kerr say they were on their way to Oasis, a low-key gay picnic intended to celebrate the anniversary of Stonewall.

The couple say they took the poles from planters in their condo, where they were being used decoratively.

On the morning of Sunday, June 27, they were preparing to bike from their place at College and Spadina to Cawthra Park, in Toronto’s Church-Wellesley neighbourhood.

Went says that a man warned the pair that police were confiscating anything that could be used as a weapon.



“Within a minute, two police officers arrived,” and asked to take the poles, says Went. Neither he nor Kerr resisted the seizure.

Went says he finds it “shocking” that the seizure would be used to justify police conduct, since “I never, ever thought of them as weapons.”

Even so, they’re taking things in stride.

“How am I supposed to get my bamboo poles back?” Kerr asks.

(Photo: people at a civil liberties march in Toronto on June 28. About 2,000 showed up to protest police overreach.)

Bookmark and Share  

Comments

Tuesday, June 29, 2010 1:46 PM

FYI Toronto Police Board and Chief’s Pride Reception@ The 519 Church Street Community Centre 4:30

JM ca


Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:00 PM

Really? You bring a stick to a 'peaceful' march and then feign shock that it was taken away? Please. There were hundreds of amazingly patient, thoughtful protesters who wanted (and deserved) to make their positions known. But we all knew that there would be a small group looking to use the rest of us for cover to break things, smash things, and act like thugs. To go to an event like this with anything resembling a weapon and then pretend that you didn't know it would be seen as such isn't believable.

Tomas C ca


Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:14 PM

@Tomas C.
Did you even read the article? The pair were on their way to a picnic in a park. They weren't involved in any march.

james b ca


Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:09 PM

@ Tomas - A typical reaction from someone who has absolutley no interest in reading to gain insight. You didn't even read the article on which you commented. Thank god you only had a keyboard to type on and not a gun firing rubber bullets or tear gas.

J Roman ca


Tuesday, June 29, 2010 9:37 PM

it is one thing to take someone to task for not reading an article before commenting. it is another thing to then use stupid hyperbole to attack them. j roman's declaration of 'Thank god you only had a keyboard to type on and not a gun firing rubber bullets or tear gas' is stupid and baseless. shame on the one for not reading the article with more than a quick glance; shame on the other for taking a typically juvenile approach to make a point.

CrankyPants ca



Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0

The Roundup

Xtra.ca's Roundup
blog is your source
for news and
analysis that has
queer people
talking.

The Roundup is
written by Xtra's
staff reporters:

Rob Salerno
rob.salerno@xtra.ca

Andrea Houston
andrea.houston@xtra.ca

Natasha Barsotti
natasha.barsotti@xtra.ca

New Comments

Comment RSS

Log in
Feed Subscribe