Sunday, June 6, 2010

Epstein, Gilbert, Khaki to return honours over Pride censorship

Rachel Epstein, Sky Gilbert and El-Farouk Khaki are just three of the more than 20 past honoured dykes, grand marshals and award recipients who will return their honours to Pride Toronto tomorrow morning in protest of the organization's choice to censor the term "Israeli Aparthied" from this year's Pride parade.

WHAT: Press conference and return of awards with photo opportunity
WHEN: Monday, June 7 at 10 am
WHERE: 519 Church Street Community Centre auditorium

Pride Awards founder and past grand marshal Salah Bachir, former 2010 grand marshal Alan Li and former 2010 honoured dyke Jane Farrow, are also scheduled to be at the conference. 

Read statements from Epstein, Gilbert and Khaki below....



 

Rachel Epstein, Honoured Dyke, 2007:


I am deeply saddened by Pride Toronto’s decision to ban the words “Israeli apartheid” from the 2010 Pride celebrations. This decision runs counter to principles of free speech and the democratic spirit upon which Pride has been built.  I was full of Pride in 2007 when I was named Honoured Dyke by Pride Toronto and by my community, for my work with LGBTQ families. But if Pride is now about narrowly defined issues, censorship and the denial of free speech, I must regretfully hand back the honour.
 
My 35 years of activism have included working with and on behalf of LGBTQ families, with domestic workers from the Caribbean and the Philippines and on a project in the Philippines exploring the impact of micro-technology on women’s work. I was a founding member of the Toronto Jewish Women’s Committee to End the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. These issues cannot be separated one from the other. The dynamics of race, class, imperialism, homophobia and transphobia are inextricably linked. The beauty and the strength of social movements lies in our recognition of these connections and in our commitment to solidarity across struggles. Pride was founded in this spirit and, for me, this spirit remains the underpinning of all struggles for social justice.
 
I cannot support a Pride that excludes, and so it is with sadness that I join my compadres in returning our honours.

--Rachel Epstein

 


Sky Gilbert, Grand Marshal, 2000:


I am returning my award to protest against the de-politicization of Pride. Pride Executive Director Tracey Sandilands was quoted as saying “We are not political, nor do we tolerate hatred of any sort, and we do not let any political group use Pride as a soapbox for their views." What does Tracey Sandilands think the purpose of Pride is? "So the queer community has a chance to celebrate its vibrancy." I respectfully disagree with this view. Being gay, lesbian, transgendered or simply queer IS political. It always has been (and will be for some time I expect) because is grounded in sex and the body. Tracey Sandilands is not the first to try and de-politicize Pride – she is the final nail in the anti-sex coffin, sounding the death knell for those who celebrate our bodies in all their splendid difference and exuberance. (The anti-sex campaign at Pride started many years ago, when Pride officials started telling us that we couldn’t have "sexual acts" on floats). How we have sex -- and whom we have sex with, have always been, and will continue to be, political. Countries across the planet still outlaw queer sex, religions demonize us, and North American governments still quibble over the details of our basic civil rights. To declare that Pride is "not political" betrays a deep lack of understanding of our community and is a slap in the face of so many who have fought deeply political battles (and continue to do so) around the world – battles that have sex and sexual orientation as their origin.

--Sky Gilbert

 


El-Farouk Khaki, 2006 Award for Excellence in Spirituality, 2009 Grand Marshal, 2009 Pride Theme Award:


When I received my Pride 2006 Award for Excellence in Spirituality for my work around Queer Muslim sexual orientation and gender issues it was a recognition from my community and my peers of my work for social justice and human dignity.
 
I was honoured when I was nominated and then elected by the community as the Pride 2009 Grand Marshall and was the recipient of the 2009 Theme Award.
 
I cannot remain proud and honoured by the recent declaration on censorship by the Pride Toronto Committee.
 
The drive for censorship at Pride began last year with non-Queer groups declaring "since when has Pride been political?" The recent decision of the Pride Committee to censor the use of the expression ‘Israeli Apartheid’ is unacceptable. In silencing dissident voices for justice, it is our history as queers that they silence.
 
I quote Dr. Li:
 
“Pride’s choice to take preemptive steps to censor our own communities’ voices and concerns in response to political and corporate pressure shows a lack of backbone to stand up for principles of inclusiveness and anti-oppression.”
 
I too urge Pride Toronto to rescind its ban. Its failure to do so will only further estrange the Bureaucracy and Governance of the Committee from Toronto’s Queer Communities.
 
Till it does so, I cannot retain my two Awards with integrity.

 --El-Farouk Khaki


Comments

Sunday, June 6, 2010 11:43 AM

Thank you for speaking out!! Your voices cannot be ignored.

JG ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 11:11 AM

Thank you to all three voices.
They needed to be heard.
Pride is Political.

spencer ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 12:21 PM

This is stupid. I would've used more colorful language, but I'm not going to waste it for this. Lets hand back Oscars because the MPA doesn't allow participants to scream "Israel is an apartheid state" from their chairs in the audience. Garbage. Take a stand for something that matters.

greg ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 12:44 PM

Well said everyone. I am so proud of many people standing up for what is right.

AK ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 12:50 PM

Thank you all so much for speaking out! I first marched in Pride under the banner of the Jewish women's committee to End the Occupation. Our Pride is ABSOLUTELY political. "No one is free, until everyone is free!"

Alisa Gayle ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 1:11 PM

Before July 2005, Prides were political in nature because gays were treated as second class citizens. Today, that is not the case. We have equal rights in Canada. Hence, although Prides started as political protests, today they are celebrations of our collective accomplishments.

To Rachel, Sky and El-Farouck: Returning your awards is quite insulting. Those awards were presented to you because you provided a service to the LGBT community. If I could have personally given you and every other honoured activist an award, I would have. But instead, there is an organization by the name of Pride TO that does that on my behalf...actually, on behalf of all queers. When I think about you retunring your awards, I think about how selfish you are acting. I think about how you are thinking of only yourselves and your views rather than the people you represented. It makes me think of my stupid drunk uncle who, at Christmas, will not only re-wrap the gifts he recieved the previous year and hand them out to the family memebers who had given those gifts to him, but also makes sure everyone knows about it once they open their gifts.

I'm not saying your opinions are invalid or wrong. What I'm saying is the act of returning your awards as a means to concretize your opinion, says much more about the kind of persons you are than it does about Pride TO's decison to not allow certain language during the parade.

I hope you rethink your planned actions.

Jason from "the gay white north" ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 2:45 PM

I don't know if this is the right place to write this:

Years ago, when I was attending university, there was a campus group with a name something like "Canadians Concerned for the Middle East" CCME. I can't remember the exact name. This group was concerned about the Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. I do remember Jewish campus groups demanding that the CCME be de-chartered as a student group. I'm guessing it was because they thought the CCME promoted hate.

There are people who do not like QuAIA. They state that if only could it change its name to "Queers for Palestinian Gay Rights" or "Queers for Palestine" would it be accepted.

If pro-Israel groups did not like a non-descriptive CCME at my university (UWO), then why would they accept "Queers for Palestine" if this group still advocated Palestinian rights vis-a-vis Israel?

The name debate is a red herring.

SD ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 2:47 PM

My mistake. It should read, "If pro-Israel groups did not like a non-descriptive CCME at my university (UWO), then why would they accept 'Queers for Palestine' INSTEAD OF 'QuAIA' if this group still advocates Palestinian rights vis-a-vis Israel?"

SD ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 2:03 PM

Thank you all for holding steadfast in this struggle to preserve the political integrity of Toronto's queer communities. At local and global levels queers still have to fight for their basic rights to be. Regardless of the state permitting queers to marry. Though some would think that time has passed and that we have "arrived" into fully participatory citizenship - that is not the case. Thank you for infusing the political rigour of our communities that is exactly why Pride is no mere celebration.

C.G. ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 3:29 PM

To those of you returning awards it is a HUGE insult to the community you represent. Your personal view on this issue aside - those awards honour the work you have done to advance, promote, advocate for and help your community. By returning them you might as well undo all that you have you done; for instead of standing up for your community and recognizing that your accomplishments are bigger than you, bigger than your personal view on this issue, you choose to slap your community in the face. I hope you never receive another award - clearly you do not understand what they mean. Shame on you.

S.F. ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 3:12 PM

Thank you to all three, and all the others taking similar stances, doing what they can to protest the decision of a few members of the Pride Toronto Board. I for one feel so much pride right now as a queer, as a person who is committed to human rights and social justice, in the beauty and strenght of all these amazing queers standing strong and principled.

Robin ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 4:57 PM

Never heard of any of these people before and did not know that Pride gave trophies every year.

Can't understand why this is such a big deal and it seems that even these three people have different reasons for returning their trophies. Maybe there is a lot of repressed anger about being gay among older gay and lesbian people and they are channeling these repressed feelings into this controversy.

Most people I talk to don't really care or haven't even heard about this.

Who cares? ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 4:39 PM

I do not support QuAIA, I find they bring more acrimony to a debate that would be well served by less of it. If there's something the conflict has been burdened by, it's a surfeit of people with hardened opinion, language and tactics and an unwillingness to listen. There is far too much self-righteous at both extremes of the Israel-Palestine conflict, as there tend to be at all extremes. Now, that's just my take, though I'm admittedly not an expert. Most of us aren't.

But I do, however, support their right to march, to offend, and to annoy. Some people are offended by nudity - we tell them to get a life and some perspective. 'Offensive' is subjective, and is not a reason to exclude someone from a parade that, in part, is designed to offend.

I don't have to like a group's tactics to honour their right to be heard, however boisterously. Let them march. I don't think free speech is an absolute: hate speech and incitement to violence should never be tolerated. I don't think that QuAIA crosses the line. The City should show us where they have, since they use that as an excuse to pressure Pride into knuckling under (that's another discussion we need to have). That QuAIA is insufficiently focused on 'anti-homophobia is a specious bit of selective censorship when Pride has always been about so much more than that.

Alex MacLean ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 5:14 PM

Great Sky, "Being gay, lesbian, transgendered or simply queer IS political" And I thought being Gay was my natural sexual orientation. But in your case, sucking cock is a political statement you're making against Harper? QuAIA and their support is getting dumber every day.

My sexuality is NOT a political statement ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 6:28 PM

Actually, I think he meant that queer sex is a fundamental threat to City Hall and the tyrannical politicians who pretend to be progressive while attempting to SILENCE pro sex pro Palestinian anti this and that federal government funded radicals.

That's my interpretation of this increasingly entertaining debate anyway.

revolutionary sex ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 6:52 PM

Well said Alex MacLean, I echo your sentiments.

I'm disappointed to see the amount of arguments in favour of "pride is not political" or "pride is no longer political." Politics are the foundation of pride. And to argue that, now that we have same-sex marriage, queers are no longer politicized, is patently false.

Besides the obvious things that still happen at home (bullying, exclusion, and social consequences for queer youth; continued legal and social discrimination against trans persons; sexism and biphobia even within our own communities, to name a few), being queer is still not 'okay' in most parts of the world. The fact that countries like Israel are trying to rebrand themselves as human rights champions because of how they treat queers MAKES their other problems queer issues (in the same manner that corporations that sponsor Pride while committing atrocities overseas create queer issues). We cannot simply allow people and organizations to do wrong in our name. It is unacceptable.

Whether or not one agrees with the tactics or language of QuAIA (which are admittedly debatable), they, like all other queers, deserve to be able to speak. If you disagree with that, fine, but Rachel, Sky, and El-Farouk obviously believe enough in their freedoms to take a public stance against censorship. These are some of the long-time leaders, and in some cases pioneers, of our Queer communities - it shocks me to see people claim they've never heard of them (especially co-founder of Buddies in Bad Times theatre, Sky Gilbert), and I for one respect these three enough not to call them "dumber" or "insulting." Their actions are, in their view (I assume) and mine, merely a further step in their commitment to the community and its right to speak - not a rejection of it.

Neal Jennings ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 6:23 PM

Which corporations that sponsor Pride are committing atrocities overseas?

revolutionary sex ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 6:04 PM

I am so glad to hear more opinions and points of views.

I think what "SD" said about the name change is the simpliest solution and the one that best reflects the values of Canadians. And like "Alex MacLean" said above, everyone has the right to speak their message as long as it's not one of hate.

The QuAIA's message should be something like, "We deserve to be treated equally. We are humans like everyone else. We deserve dignity and respect. Stop oppressing us!" And not something like, "Down with the government they're just a bunch of stupid people who think we are garbage."

I also think what "Who Cares?" says is true. No one has heard about this issue and really, no one cares. I mean, I care...but everyone I've spoken to isn't really concerned. Mainstream media hasn't picked it up so it's not on anyone's radar. I think that's why there is a press conference tomorrow (Monday). A press release will go out "on the wire." Who knows who will pick it up and what kind of a spin they'll put on it.

Finally, "My sexuality is NOT a political statement" got it right on the money. For me too, having sex with my husband is an expression of love. If it were a political statement, against Harper and his God Squad, I'd be having sex 24/7! lol (Man, I can't wait for that guy to go!)

Jason from "the gay white north" ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 6:50 PM

To Neil Jennings: I regret to inform you that I, too, have never heard of the 3 people above. And I also believe it when you say they are true to the LGBT community.

I'm not critiziing their values and beliefs.

I critize the choice to perform the act of returning a gift to the person who gave it to you.

It's rude. Lacks class.

Let's not neglect to look at the fact that these people are not doing all this privately. No, no...gotta make a BIG show of it. Cameras. Microphones. Reporters. And then a big dramatic scene where the "pioneers" of the LGBT community make a political statement by giving back an award from the LGBT community.

Well, I shouldn't be too harsh....Monday hasn't happened yet.

Jason from "the gay white north" ca


Sunday, June 6, 2010 11:44 PM

To Jason from the gay white north. If sex with your husband is not a political act, why is it illegal in so many countries (and in Canada till recently)? The "3 people above" that you consider too dramatic, are part of the movement that has fought hard for you to enjoy sex with your husband without fear. At the very least we must listen to their opinion. We owe it to them.

JG ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 12:23 AM

El Farouk Khaki the Jew-hater can take his award and shove it up his skinny Muslim behind. Better still, why doesn't he go back to his Arab homeland where we're sure he will be more than welcomed. Sky Gilbert, no use wasting words on that nutcase. And Rachel Epstein, we in the Jewish community have one word for people like her: Jew-diot. Bet her Jewish relatives are real proud of her. By the way, we're sure Pride will manage quite fine without the triplets: Khaki, Gilbert and the Jew-diot.

Ms. Zionist Forever ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 12:09 AM

Funny S.F. and gay white north, you haven't heard about these people? Well, I have. Sky gilbert has been around since I came out in the late 1990s. Epstein started a group for women who had children and helps parents in our community. And, while I have heard mixed reviews about Farouk, I have heard of him. Let's be clear S.F. they are not insulting our community. I am the community, the people they have been involved with and helped in the community, are our community... Pride doesn't represent our community. And, what nerve do you people have trying to guilt trip these people, who actually work and volunteer in our community? Shame on you! If you don't know them, you know nothing about our community, which might explain why you are so happy to side with the likes of Gladstone. It doesn't reflect bad on them that you don't know them, it reflects bad on you, your knowledge of this community and your participation in this community.

Tam ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 8:02 AM

Dear Ms. Zionist, I'd answer that you are obviously helping the cause of QuAIA by referring to three members of our community the way you do. I don't have to because I believe that everyone notices how filled you are of hatred for these people and anyone who opposses Israel's actions. It is people like you who supported Gladstone, people blinded by hatred towards Palestinians and their supporters and willing to do anything to silence them. You know darling, the irony of all of this is that people like you and Gladstone have done quite a bit for the pro-palestinian cause. Inadvertedly, but someone should send you all a thank you note.

Tam ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 10:09 AM

Mr "gay white north" - you are either very dim or willfully ignorant.

You write:
Let's not neglect to look at the fact that these people are not doing all this privately. No, no...gotta make a BIG show of it. Cameras. Microphones. Reporters. And then a big dramatic scene where the "pioneers" of the LGBT community make a political statement by giving back an award from the LGBT community.

That's kind of the point. The protest here is that very well known personalities honoured by Pride Toronto for being outstanding citizens in the community are repulsed by the decision to censor legitimate free speech. Many of these honourees have worked for or voiced unpopular opinions of the sort that are at risk of future censorship if this bone-headed decision is allowed to go unchallenged.

Our history is based on the freedom of expression and overcoming a hostile majority. Our strength is in the diversity of opinion and discourse. Censoring a law abiding group of LGBT citizens disregards and disrespects that history.


Dan ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 10:07 AM

That's a lot of hatred you're spewing there, Ms. Zionist Forever. Are you always that hateful toward people who share an opinion different from your own? Do you relish censoring such people from expressing their opinion?


Dan ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 12:16 PM

This is stupid. I would've used more colorful language, but I'm not going to waste it for this. Lets hand back Oscars because the MPA doesn't allow participants to scream "Israel is an apartheid state" from their chairs in the audience. Garbage. Take a stand for something that matters. The Oscars are not a political forum. And this *does* matter!

Animal ca


Monday, June 7, 2010 1:34 PM

Ms Zionist, you do no great service to your cause by calling El Farouk Khaki a Jew hater. I have known him since 1990 when we worked together, and he is no such thing. There certainly are Jew-hating elements associated with Israeli Apartheid Week in general, and I know from travel in Turkey for example that the Jew-hatred can be very much on the surface - but again, not all Turks. But I don't get a whiff of that from the QuAIA people. Epstein, Flanders and other Jews are involved - there are many in the pro-Palestine agitation. I don't like QuAIA's communications strategy, as I've said above. But let's not accuse people of hating Jews simply because they criticize Israel's actions AS A STATE. I can despise the US government's war mongering without hating Americans (or, at least most of them!) And I don't ever want to stand accused of hating Muslims because I am critical of many strands of Islam - Islamophobic is a over-used term lobbed at many people who ask inconvenient questions. We need to separate the two, except where there is evidence they are joined together. And I hope that all associated with the various strands of "Israeil Apartheid" organizing will continue to exclude anti-Semitic elements from their organizations. That would only weaken your message. The flag burnings and pro-Hamas/Hezbollah stuff on the news (not, to be clear, a product of QuAIA) can confuse the uninitiated. There are people of honour on both sides of this debate. There are also hotheads. Nothing is gained by doing character assassination of Khaki or anyone else. Ditto for Martin Gladstone. Let's focus on what they have to say and cut the nasty personal attacks.

Alex MacLean ca


Tuesday, June 8, 2010 7:36 PM

Once upon a time there was an old farmer who died (as old farmers occasionally do). When his kin looked through his desk they found two drawers full of string. One was labelled "Used String To Keep" and the other was labelled "Used String Too Short To Keep". There is really a quite simple solution to this problem. We should have the regular Pride parade with participation restricted to groups who agree with Pride Toronto's guidelines and generally show some good taste and self-restraint and a second Unpride parade for everyone else with both parades running simultaneously on separate streets. The Pride parade will go down Yonge St while the Unpride parade can go round Queen's Park Crescent. Everyone can decide which parade they want to donate to, volunteer for, and go to watch. Or perhaps the Unpride parade can be a trailer to the Pride parade and follow it so that visitors with tired feet and cranky children can leave at the start of the Unpride parade and exercise their fundamental right to choose what they want to watch. Obviously those with a taste for bad taste and being harangued about sundry political issues will stay and watch the Unpride parade while the others can go home and relax while sipping cool mint juleps under their favorite magnolia tree while wondering what the crazy people are doing. Pourquois pas mes amis?

Yours Truly



Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0

The Roundup

Xtra.ca's Roundup
blog is your source
for news and
analysis that has
queer people
talking.

The Roundup is
written by Xtra's
staff reporters:

Rob Salerno
rob.salerno@xtra.ca

Andrea Houston
andrea.houston@xtra.ca

Natasha Barsotti
natasha.barsotti@xtra.ca

New Comments

Comment RSS

Log in
Feed Subscribe