Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Ties between US evangelicals and Uganda's anti-gay bill

Over the weekend, the New York Times published a fascinating feature exploring the links between US evangelicals and Uganda's anti-gay bill. A snippet, describing how three American evangelicals gave a series of talks in Uganda's capital about "the gay agenda -- that whole hidden and dark agenda":

For three days, according to participants and audio recordings, thousands of Ugandans, including police officers, teachers and national politicians, listened raptly to the Americans, who were presented as experts on homosexuality. The visitors discussed how to make gay people straight, how gay men often sodomized teenage boys and how "the gay movement is an evil institution" whose goal is "to defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity."

Be sure to check out the full NYT piece. Also listen to the multimedia feature, including audio interviews with the bill's creator and a Ugandan gay rights activist. 

Left: US evangelical Scott Lively
Right: Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni.
 
Evangelical Christian Scott Lively spoke at the 2009 anti-gay conference in Uganda. Watch this newly obtained video of Lively's speech, via Box Turtle Bulletin. Following the conference, Lively bragged that he dropped a "nuclear bomb against the gay agenda in Uganda":
 
 

In late December, a report suggested the Ugandan president may soften the anti-gay bill, following international outrage. But while the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality" may be removed from the final version, the bill still poses a very serious threat to gay Ugandans:

Uganda's ethics and integrity minister Nsaba Buturo said the revised law would most likely make life in prison the maximum penalty for offenders. "There have been a lot of discussions in government regarding the proposed law, but we now think a life sentence could be better because it gives room for offenders to be rehabilitated," he said. "Killing them might not be helpful," he added. (Read the full story)

Read more on Xtra.ca:

 
Bookmark and Share

 

Comments

Wednesday, January 6, 2010 2:28 PM

1- What an American-centered view of the situation! The New York Times article makes it sound like, without the anti-gay Americans' visit & conferences, We Ugandans never would have come up with this anti-gay sentiment on our own. Like we're a bunch of idiots with no original thoughts; blank slates just waiting to be indoctrinated by the white man. What a completely condescending view of us Africans! The truth is,
many Africans, all over the continent - without the proselytizing of the American evangelicals, have such views. Why not analyze this fact? Why do you always make it about YOU, America?? Get over yourselves!

2-The law is meant to restore the cultural values, virtues and norms of Ugandans which homosexuality is targeting, especially among children. Stop blaming Christians....(Muslims, Hindus, African traditionalists...all support this law)...In Africa life and fertility are sacred; anything that stunts or blocks them, such as unnatural acts, like homosexuality, are treated with contempt.

3- We, Ugandans know and believe that homosexuality involves practices that are dangerous and high risk to the human body which is designed for heterosexual functions.Uganda is willing to fight the spread of this abomination. Now if only the WEST would follow suit,we could rid ourselves of this vile filth.

4- The West presents its culture as universal--using terms as human rights, universal freedom, global war on terror etc....The assumption is that other societies can only become civilized if they abandon their cultures and embrace the Western ethos. Behind this agenda there is race, racism and racialism....this is intended to subjugate non Western peoples. On the surface, it appears to be just homosexuality but there is a deeper meaning...a cultural and racial war.

5-Have you ever heard Europeans or Americans condemn Saudi Arabia or Asian countries for their laws against homosexuality? ( they are even more harsh). Why do Western countries specifically point out African countries? Why is the West so obsessed with homosexuality in Africa? We have more pressing issues to deal with.

6- This is a cultural challenge. We face a second wave of colonialism, both subtle and ruthless at the same time. We Africans have a duty and obligation to protect ourselves from Western contamination, totalitarian liberal activism, and intellectual cynicism.

Olal Otunu ca


Wednesday, January 6, 2010 8:52 PM

To Olal: Africa, like everywhere else, has a long history of indigenous homosexuality, if you'd bother to research the continent's history. Imported religions such as Christianity and Islam, plus imported attitudes from European colonialism, are a primary source of anti-gay hatred in Africa. Gay sexuality and love are natural, beautiful, and good, anywhere in the world. This is because same-sex bodies are designed to fit together so well, without the burden of producing unexpected children as a result. That is just an undeniable fact based on reality. It is heterosexism and homophobia that stunt societies, particularly children who witness it, or become subject to it. Gay people don't need to take any lecturing from straight people on dangerous lifestyles. Seeing how straight people have over-populated the world to a crisis point due to their lusts and greed, and massacred each other over centuries of history, gay people could never match such devastation and anguish even if that were the goal. Of course, gay people simply want to live their lives in love. Stop using your own gay people as pawns in your bruised-ego war with the West. It's petty, cruel, and selfish.

Randy ca


Saturday, January 9, 2010 7:13 PM

In regards to Olal's comment, I've been reading a number of different stories about the proposed anti-gay legislation in Uganda and have been reading many of the comments associated with those stories and have seen a number of comments almost identical to Olal's which made me realize that its just some anti-gay organization's talking points in support of the legislation that are being parroted over and over again. For those who haven't seen this website http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/ has much indepth and detailed reports on the situation in Uganda and elsewhere. Its a very well researched and professional site well worth visiting.
In regards to Olal's comment:
1 - the fact is the legislation was created right after an anti-gay conference in Uganda which prominently featured the US evangelicals as experts on homosexuality and it was written by attendees of that conference, claiming the legislation ,the conference and the attendees were all just coincidence defies credibility.
2 - read your history, homosexual activity was largely accepted in pre-colonial Africa, the laws against homosexuality were introduced by the colonizers in response to the acceptance of homosexual behaviour they found there. The traditional culture of Africa didn't consider homosexuality a problem.
3 - there is nothing inherently high risk or dangerous about gay sex, yes STDs are a problem but for both hetero and gay sex equally, in Africa HIV is a predominantly hetero problem and as anyone who has had gay sex can assure you the parts fit together beautifully.
4 - the concept of human rights is not a racist attack on Africans, it was in large part developed to fight against racism and it allows for people to practice any religion or culture equally without constraint and the premise of them are to ensure all groups are able to to practice their religion and culture fully without being discriminated against or destroyed by another group. Human rights are as far removed from everything you attribute to them as day is from night.
5 - Yes there has been much condemnation of the treatment of sexual minorities in places like Saudi Arabia and Iran but Uganda is very different from those countries and is getting a much more vocal backlash towards its anti-gay legislation because it is a democracy, its a fact that much more is expected from democracies than from theocracies, democracies are supposed to protect its citizens and not execute them for being who they are. Plus Uganda receives much international aid and the international community has an interest in how its money is being spent, the aid is meant to support its people not to oppress them like this anti-gay bill will do.
6 - you're right to a degree, African nations are facing a second wave of colonization of a sort but not from the sources you suggest, its the religious evangelicals who are "colonizing" Africa this time around and they target African states because they see them as weak and easily manipulated into advancing their social policies which they know they could never achieve in their home countries. This has been admitted by Christian evangelicals here in North America, (check out the Box Turtle site, I don't recall the references off hand) they're proud of how much influence they have on African politicians in advancing the sort of regressive anti-gay laws they would like to see here. However the gay and lesbian activists in Uganda are all Ugandans themselves, the desire for freedom to be themselves is an Ugandan thing and not one imported from the west though I'm sure they've seen how much better life is for LGBT folk in western countries and want the same for themselves. Its no different than any other western thing that has been adopted by Ugandans and other Africans because it works well and makes life better. The LGBT activists in Uganda didn't need outsiders coming into their country to advocate for their freedom to be themselves, they know its the right thing in their hearts and is in line with Ugandan tradition from before the time of the colonizers. If Ugandans really wanted to protect their own culture they would reject this anti-gay bill since it is the product of direct interference by the religious colonizers of today and they would remove all the anti-gay laws that were introduced by the original colonizers. To claim that this anti-gay bill will protect the culture of Uganda is sad reflection of how Ugandan culture claims the culture of past colonizers as their own and ignores their own traditional culture.

Rich ca


Saturday, January 9, 2010 8:14 PM

I've just been reading Box Turtle Bulletin again and found out that the religious organization that brought Uganda its anti-gay bill has between 3 to 12 Canadian MPs as supporters who want to attend the organization's (College of Prayer) events in Uganda and to bring the College of Prayer to Canada's Parliament, check out "What’s Good For Uganda Is Good For Canada?" at http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/06/17469
The last thing we need here is more of the same sort of thinking that produced Uganda's anti-gay bill.

Rich ca


Sunday, January 10, 2010 9:24 AM

If you really want to hit uganda where it hurts boycott their coffee. It is is most coffee products as a secondary coffee filler. Most coffee companys use ugandian coffee.

Bill Ottawa ca



Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0

The Roundup

Xtra.ca's Roundup
blog is your source
for news and
analysis that has
queer people
talking.

The Roundup is
written by Xtra's
staff reporters:

Rob Salerno
rob.salerno@xtra.ca

Andrea Houston
andrea.houston@xtra.ca

Natasha Barsotti
natasha.barsotti@xtra.ca

and

Adam Glen
Editorial Intern


Log in
Feed Subscribe